<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Endpoint Office Mode license count - On the gateway. in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/78884#M11123</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a weird one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've had a lot of calls in the last few days to confirm the number of remote access licenses that customers have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now remote access licensing has always appeared to be a bit of a dark art with so many different SKUs and license macros.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've noticed that in a lot of cases that the gateways MASSIVELY over count the number of available Endpoint office mode licenses (not SNX or MAB though).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some cases, and this is confirmed through vpnd debugs and fw tab counts, a gateway will allow 5 times the number of licensed connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've confirmed this overage on 4 different customers so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3 of them showed the 5 time behaviour, but the 4th showed about 3.5 times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now this 4th customer had a mix of CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+25 and CPVP-VSC-25-NGX.&amp;nbsp; From what I can work out, the CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+25 are counted 5 times, but the CPVP-VSC-25-NGX are counted correctly once.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a ticket open with TAC about the issue, but I thought I'd reach out and see if anyone else had seen this behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An example (anonymised) cplic print from the manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Host Expiration Features
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSM-C-U CPSB-NPM CPSB-EPM CPSB-LOGS CPSB-MNTR CPSB-UDIR CPSB-PRVS CPSB-IPSA CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPEP-C-1+25 CPSB-EP-FW+25 CPEP-PERP CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSM-C-U CPSB-ADN-M CPSB-ACCL-M CPSB-NPM CPSB-EPM CPSB-LOGS CPSB-MNTR CPSB-MPTL CPSB-UDIR CPSB-PRVS CPMP-EVR-1-NGX CPSB-SWB CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSB-ADN-M-HA CPSB-ACCL-M-HA CK-98492C5564A4
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-VPS-1-NGX CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+100 CPEP-PERP CPSB-SWB CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-VPS-1-NGX CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+25 CPEP-PERP CPSB-SWB CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSB-MNTR CK-ABCD12345678&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;125 Endpoint licenses, plus a bunch of wrongly attached SNX licenses (should be on gateways)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And an anonymised VPN debug output from the gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23][tunnel] available_om_licenses: sc_lic 625, sc_unlimit 0, cvpn_lic 5, cvpn_unlimit 0
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23] fw_stat_tab: 630 elements
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23] fw_stat_tab: 0 elements
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23][tunnel] available_om_licenses: number of connected users: om_users 630, snx_users 0, l2tp_users 0 &lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oh, these are all R80.x gateways.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;edit: cleared up the post a bit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second edit:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was further confirmed when we added a Sandblast +100 eval and then vpn debug showed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 14:29:03][tunnel] available_om_licenses: sc_lic 1125, sc_unlimit 0, cvpn_lic 5, cvpn_unlimit 0
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 14:29:03][tunnel] available_om_licenses: number of connected users: om_users 628, snx_users 0, l2tp_users 0
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 14:29:03][tunnel] available_om_licenses: Enough licenses for new user. Users:628 Licenses: 1130. &lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add a 100 user eval and it now thinks it has 1125 license. Another 500.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MattElkington</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-20T00:57:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Endpoint Office Mode license count - On the gateway.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/78884#M11123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a weird one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've had a lot of calls in the last few days to confirm the number of remote access licenses that customers have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now remote access licensing has always appeared to be a bit of a dark art with so many different SKUs and license macros.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've noticed that in a lot of cases that the gateways MASSIVELY over count the number of available Endpoint office mode licenses (not SNX or MAB though).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In some cases, and this is confirmed through vpnd debugs and fw tab counts, a gateway will allow 5 times the number of licensed connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've confirmed this overage on 4 different customers so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3 of them showed the 5 time behaviour, but the 4th showed about 3.5 times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now this 4th customer had a mix of CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+25 and CPVP-VSC-25-NGX.&amp;nbsp; From what I can work out, the CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+25 are counted 5 times, but the CPVP-VSC-25-NGX are counted correctly once.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a ticket open with TAC about the issue, but I thought I'd reach out and see if anyone else had seen this behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An example (anonymised) cplic print from the manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Host Expiration Features
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSM-C-U CPSB-NPM CPSB-EPM CPSB-LOGS CPSB-MNTR CPSB-UDIR CPSB-PRVS CPSB-IPSA CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPEP-C-1+25 CPSB-EP-FW+25 CPEP-PERP CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-SNX-5-NGX CPSB-SWB CPSB-ADNC-M CK-00-00-00-00-00-00
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSM-C-U CPSB-ADN-M CPSB-ACCL-M CPSB-NPM CPSB-EPM CPSB-LOGS CPSB-MNTR CPSB-MPTL CPSB-UDIR CPSB-PRVS CPMP-EVR-1-NGX CPSB-SWB CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSB-ADN-M-HA CPSB-ACCL-M-HA CK-98492C5564A4
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-VPS-1-NGX CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+100 CPEP-PERP CPSB-SWB CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPVP-VPS-1-NGX CPVP-VSC-5-NGX+25 CPEP-PERP CPSB-SWB CK-ABCD12345678
zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz never CPSB-MNTR CK-ABCD12345678&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;125 Endpoint licenses, plus a bunch of wrongly attached SNX licenses (should be on gateways)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And an anonymised VPN debug output from the gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23][tunnel] available_om_licenses: sc_lic 625, sc_unlimit 0, cvpn_lic 5, cvpn_unlimit 0
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23] fw_stat_tab: 630 elements
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23] fw_stat_tab: 0 elements
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 12:41:23][tunnel] available_om_licenses: number of connected users: om_users 630, snx_users 0, l2tp_users 0 &lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oh, these are all R80.x gateways.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;edit: cleared up the post a bit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second edit:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was further confirmed when we added a Sandblast +100 eval and then vpn debug showed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 14:29:03][tunnel] available_om_licenses: sc_lic 1125, sc_unlimit 0, cvpn_lic 5, cvpn_unlimit 0
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 14:29:03][tunnel] available_om_licenses: number of connected users: om_users 628, snx_users 0, l2tp_users 0
[vpnd 12345 1234567890]@Gateway[17 Mar 14:29:03][tunnel] available_om_licenses: Enough licenses for new user. Users:628 Licenses: 1130. &lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add a 100 user eval and it now thinks it has 1125 license. Another 500.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/78884#M11123</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattElkington</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-20T00:57:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Endpoint Office Mode license count - On the gateway.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/79180#M11124</link>
      <description>Actually, it looks like they're all being counted five times in this example.&lt;BR /&gt;Does every instance of this have wrongly attached SNX licenses on the management or just this one example?&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, this is definitely an error in your customers favor. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":beaming_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😁&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2020 05:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/79180#M11124</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-22T05:54:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Endpoint Office Mode license count - On the gateway.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/79182#M11125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would really like to see what my &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Remote-Access-Solutions/One-liner-for-Remote-Access-VPN-Statistics/m-p/79047" target="_self"&gt;One-liner for Remote Access VPN Statistics&lt;/A&gt; shows on these gateways.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2020 06:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Endpoint-Office-Mode-license-count-On-the-gateway/m-p/79182#M11125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-22T06:01:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

