<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX) in SASE and Remote Access</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84069#M10544</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;From your "after" &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -s&lt;/STRONG&gt; output:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;1080 packets pruned from receive queue because of socket buffer overrun&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It looks like the SNX client is not reading the receive socket buffer fast enough (or this could be a symptom of the overly large stated TCPT size), causing an overflow and packet loss which is killing your performance.&amp;nbsp; The relevant Linux kernel values are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This buffering issue appears to be happening at the Layer 4/TCP level.&amp;nbsp; A few things to check:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Run &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -ni&lt;/STRONG&gt; and verify that the Layer 2 DRP/OVR/ERR counters are zero or near zero on the Ubuntu box.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) Is the Ubuntu box heavily loaded CPU-wise?&amp;nbsp; Any chance the SNX client isn't getting enough CPU slices?&amp;nbsp; When running the SNX client from the command line, try prepending &lt;STRONG&gt;nice -n -20&lt;/STRONG&gt; to it to raise its CPU scheduling priority to maximum, so like this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;nice -n -20 snx ...&lt;/STRONG&gt; and see if that improves things.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Beyond that either the SNX client itself or the Linux kernel variables will need to be tweaked, you can read more about this topic here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10598195" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10598195&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The packet capture didn't show anything useful, would recommend involving TAC from this point on especially looking at vpnd on your gateway...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 12:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-04T12:35:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83909#M10539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a company I use CheckPoint VPN on Windows 10. Logging&amp;nbsp; through the GUI works well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But as almost everyone in my team and across the company has changed to Linux (I have Ubuntu 20.04 in dualboot)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;due to much better performance from development tools, I try to make my VPN connection to work using SNX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I just can't make it work and I did try it on Ubuntu 18.04,19.10,20.04 and MAcOs Catalina 10.15.4&amp;nbsp; ....&amp;nbsp; On Mac If using GUI login then it works as on Win10, but if using SNX from CLI, then it fails as on Ubuntu .....&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whenever there is a bigger stuff to be downloaded from GIT repository I always get a&lt;BR /&gt;BROKEN PIPE.&amp;nbsp; I even got a broken pipe on 10MB big repository ....but only once ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And my download is ridiculous ... On Win10 I have a constant 1MB/s and on Ubuntu It starts from 800kb/s and&lt;BR /&gt;drops to even 6KB&amp;nbsp; in a matter of minutes ..... being in avg of 250-300kb/s&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All the network is inaccessible after broken pipe and even just before this happens ... no browser links work ... I get no reply from pinging DNS&amp;nbsp; ...unless I disconnect SNX and reconnect ... then everything is OK again ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed versions of SNX from 7075 to 8061, 10003 .... they all connect but non works as written above ....&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried starting SNX from CLI and managed to install firefox 48 version and connecting through Java applet ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I added debugging to SNX .....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And now I can see there "ssl_link:: handle_received_packet: received a too long packet" and "fwasync_mux_in: requested input buffer length to big (1148116496)"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I connect as : snx -s servername -u user .... we use only user/pass authentication&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please if someone can help me on this , cause I'm killing my self on this for the last 10 days now ....&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the log (also file in attachment):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: got 147448 of 148736 bytes == 1288 bytes required
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_do_read: read 1288 bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: managed to read 1288 of 1288 bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: call: 80e2c70 with 4
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link_fwasync_client_handler: state: RECEIVE_PACKT - entering
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link_fwasync_client_handler: RECEIVE_PACKT state - expecting 148736 bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link:: handle_received_packet: received a too long packet 
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link_fwasync_client_handler: received packet ok
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: rc=1, next: 80e2c70 with 3, req: 8r, 0w
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_InputPending 1 pending bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_InputPending 1 pending bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: got 0 of 8 bytes == 8 bytes required
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_do_read: read 8 bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: managed to read 8 of 8 bytes
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: call: 80e2c70 with 3
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link_fwasync_client_handler: state: RECEIVE_TCPT_HEADER - entering
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link:: handle_TCPT_header: TCPT header: with len= 1148116496 and type= -906032325
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: 1: rc=1, next: 80e2c70 with 4, req: 1148116496r, 0w
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_mux_in: requested input buffer length to big (1148116496)
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_end_conn: scheduling the end of connection 1
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_do_end_conn: closing connection 1 (conn=87e4ca0)
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_link:: ssl_link_fwasync_end_handler: ending connection 
snx.elg.8:[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_tunnel::link_failure_cb: got link failure, close tunnel
snx.elg.8:[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ssl_tunnel::link_failure_cb: scheduling reuse to 2000 milli-seconds
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_fwasync_close: start shutdown
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] fwasync_do_end_conn: end closing connection 87e4ca0 1
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_ShutdownHandler: rc=0 (1) SSL negotiation finished successfully
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_ShutdownHandler_in_sock: called
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_ShutdownHandler_in_sock: called
snx.elg.8-[ 5859 -141541312]@kmarin-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:41:08] ckpSSL_ShutdownHandler_in_sock: called&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 19:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83909#M10539</guid>
      <dc:creator>mackrispi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-02T19:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83946#M10540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see my response in this thread describing a somewhat similar issue:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint-Security-Products/VPN-download-speed-is-very-slow-on-Linux-if-comparing-to-the/m-p/83823" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Endpoint-Security-Products/VPN-download-speed-is-very-slow-on-Linux-if-comparing-to-the/m-p/83823&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your debug is interesting, the presence of term "TCPT" would seem to indicate the use of Visitor Mode which must be handled by the vpnd daemon on your gateway.&amp;nbsp; Considering that this behavior has followed you through several versions of SNX, I'd suggest taking a closer look at vpnd on your gateway:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) What code level and Jumbo HFA are you using on the gateway, as there have been many vpnd stability fixes over the years.&amp;nbsp; The fact that your SNX client is receiving a TCPT header of stated length&amp;nbsp;1148116496 makes no sense, and may indicate some kind of bug in vpnd which constructed the header.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2)&amp;nbsp;The SNX client could be somehow corrupting or misinterpreting the TCPT header, but this seems unlikely.&amp;nbsp; Can't really think of any Linux component external to SNX that might potentially interfere with traffic like this, do you have any special or customized network/firewall components on the Linux box itself?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Is the vpnd daemon crashing and being immediately restarted by fwd on your gateway?&amp;nbsp; That might explain some of the behavior you are seeing.&amp;nbsp; Check the start time of the vpnd process on your gateway and look in $FWDIR/log/vpnd.elg.&amp;nbsp; These lines from your debug give credence to this theory:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;[ 5859 -141541312]@username-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:52:15] fwasync_mux_in: 2: got 0 of 8 bytes == 8 bytes required&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5859 -141541312]@username-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:52:15] ckpSSL_do_Read: failed to read: Connection reset by peer&lt;BR /&gt;[ 5859 -141541312]@username-HP-ZBook-15-G5[2 May 20:52:15] fwasync_mux_in: 2: read: Connection reset by peer&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2020 15:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83946#M10540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-03T15:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83963#M10541</link>
      <description>Highly recommend getting the TAC involved here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only alternative to SNX would be to use an L2TP client.&lt;BR /&gt;There's a couple of articles on CheckMates that explain how to make this work with the R80.30 and R80.40 releases, though it is not formally supported outside of a specific customer release you can obtain through your local Check Point office.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83963#M10541</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-04T00:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83992#M10542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you to both of you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will forward this to our IT to take a look at it.&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Kris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 07:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/83992#M10542</guid>
      <dc:creator>mackrispi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-04T07:09:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84014#M10543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did follow the steps as suggested in first reply from Timothy ... to identify slow network ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In attachment there is an excerpt from my full log from Wireshark.... tcpdump.csv&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I added netstat before vpn and after ....&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have TCP retransmissions happening every 5sec .... and there is a lot of this ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know what to look for, so I kindly ask you to please take a sec and take a look.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kris&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 08:59:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84014#M10543</guid>
      <dc:creator>mackrispi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-04T08:59:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84069#M10544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From your "after" &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -s&lt;/STRONG&gt; output:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;1080 packets pruned from receive queue because of socket buffer overrun&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It looks like the SNX client is not reading the receive socket buffer fast enough (or this could be a symptom of the overly large stated TCPT size), causing an overflow and packet loss which is killing your performance.&amp;nbsp; The relevant Linux kernel values are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This buffering issue appears to be happening at the Layer 4/TCP level.&amp;nbsp; A few things to check:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Run &lt;STRONG&gt;netstat -ni&lt;/STRONG&gt; and verify that the Layer 2 DRP/OVR/ERR counters are zero or near zero on the Ubuntu box.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) Is the Ubuntu box heavily loaded CPU-wise?&amp;nbsp; Any chance the SNX client isn't getting enough CPU slices?&amp;nbsp; When running the SNX client from the command line, try prepending &lt;STRONG&gt;nice -n -20&lt;/STRONG&gt; to it to raise its CPU scheduling priority to maximum, so like this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;nice -n -20 snx ...&lt;/STRONG&gt; and see if that improves things.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Beyond that either the SNX client itself or the Linux kernel variables will need to be tweaked, you can read more about this topic here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10598195" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10598195&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The packet capture didn't show anything useful, would recommend involving TAC from this point on especially looking at vpnd on your gateway...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 12:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84069#M10544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-04T12:35:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84104#M10545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for all the help guys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did check CPU and no one used CPU more then 10% ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As well I did run netstat -ni&amp;nbsp; and all counters were zero before and after&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try as you guys suggested and see if we can make this work. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your help is much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 15:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84104#M10545</guid>
      <dc:creator>mackrispi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-04T15:09:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84531#M10546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to share, how I fixed my problem with my problems and retransmissions happening all the time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just before I totally gave up, I came across "linux tuning" article. Something about changing different parameters&amp;nbsp; ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And to fix my problem only one had to be changed&amp;nbsp; and that is (default is 1):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then to make it permanently&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Update&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/etc/sysctl.conf&amp;nbsp; by adding this line at the end:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 06:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84531#M10546</guid>
      <dc:creator>mackrispi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-08T06:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Broken Pipe: Requested input buffer length to big (SNX)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84574#M10547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nice find, so it did turn out to be a problematic interaction between the SNX client and the Linux OS after all!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 12:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SASE-and-Remote-Access/Broken-Pipe-Requested-input-buffer-length-to-big-SNX/m-p/84574#M10547</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-08T12:27:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

