<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151570#M987</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I suppose correction layer communication should remain only in active site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:52:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:52:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151426#M963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on yesterday Maestro Masters Round Table June 2022:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/Maestro-Masters-Round-Table-June-2022-Video-Slides-and-Q-amp-A/m-p/151394#M959" target="_self"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/Maestro-Masters-Round-Table-June-2022-Video-Slides-and-Q...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There was a question and answer related to Q-in-Q requirement for Dual site architecture through external L2 switches:&lt;BR /&gt;===&lt;BR /&gt;Q: Do we still need to use QinQ VLAN for dual site Maestro configurations?&lt;BR /&gt;A: QinQ is not required as of R81.10.&lt;BR /&gt;===&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;May I request more details regarding above answer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on available information like:&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk168092&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Quantum" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;sk168092&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk168814&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Quantum" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;sk168814&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;or&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Maestro/GSG/EN/Topics/Connecting-Cables-for-Dual-Site-2-Switches.htm?tocpath=Connecting%20Cables%20to%20Quantum%20Maestro%20Orchestrators%7CDual%20Site%7C_____2" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Quantum Maestro Getting Started Guide&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;there is still info that Layer 2 switches must support VLAN Q-in-Q Tunneling for Dual site architecture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and BR&lt;BR /&gt;Daniel.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:29:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151426#M963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T08:29:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151427#M964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325"&gt;@Tal_Ben_Avraham&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;can you please answer?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151427#M964</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T08:38:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151430#M965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The default setting is to use QnQ. That mean, the default VLAN 3600 (or 3601 for a second pair of MHOs) will include all Sync vlans of security groups (3801,3802, etc..).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you disable QnQ, then you have to configure vlans 3801, 3802, etc,,, in trunk with 3951 (or 3952 for a second pair of MHOs) instead of 3600 (or 3601).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:52:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151430#M965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T08:52:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151434#M967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wow&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;this is weird, when I was trying to change the base-vlan for the sync but got this:&lt;BR /&gt;set maestro configuration security-appliances inter-site base-vlan 3800&lt;BR /&gt;NMSSG 1 Invalid VLAN ID. Security Appliances inter-site base VLAN ID must be a number in the range of 3600-3650&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This would mean that we need 3600-3601 for the sync and 3951, 3952 with 2 sec groups.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However I can tell you it does NOT work with the ranges 3600-3650&amp;nbsp; and 3950-3970 on the trunks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We do have this setting to disable QinQ:&lt;BR /&gt;set maestro configuration security-appliances inter-site vlan encapsulation disable&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:14:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151434#M967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T09:14:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151437#M968</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is because these 3800 VLANs are reserved for inter-SGMs sync. In general - please avoid using following vlans:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 714px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17002i7ECD728A7DA9AA11/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151437#M968</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T09:18:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151439#M969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So the simple question is which VLAN's need to be allowed on the trunk between the sites when inter-site vlan encryption is disabled?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151439#M969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T09:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151441#M970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For first pair of MHOs: 3951 and 3801; for second pair - 3952 and 3801 (assuming you have only 1 security group). For any next security group add 3800+security group number&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151441#M970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T10:31:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151447#M971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is weird then as all documents say its using 3600 and up instead of 3800 and up, but it explains a lot why it is not working.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151447#M971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T11:14:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151448#M972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Documentation is correct. This is 3600, but 3600 is external VLAN tag.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That means, sync vlans of SGMs are coming with double-tag: [3600(3801)],&amp;nbsp;[3600(3802)], etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you disable QnQ, it does not wrap 380x VLANs into 360x tags, so it comes as I explained above&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151448#M972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T11:19:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151452#M974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be nice to update all documentation regarding the possibility to avoid requirements Q-in-Q tunneling since R81.10, after disabling vlan encapsulation on MHO's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But as I understand it still limited to environment with no already existing vlans 3800+SG and 3951/3952, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;BR /&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:37:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151452#M974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T11:37:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151457#M975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree. We will work on it&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151457#M975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T12:13:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151557#M980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;it woulf really be helpful to have a R81.10 version of sk168092 with the above information incorporated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151557#M980</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T09:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151563#M982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17364"&gt;@Maarten_Sjouw&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; I already asked about update through&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk168092. I hope sk owner will do it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BR,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Daniel.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151563#M982</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:25:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151566#M983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;1 question left, how big is the chance that VLAN 370x will appear on the inter-site link?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:41:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151566#M983</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:41:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151567#M984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;VLAN 370x is used for correction layer. So, it's crucial.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151567#M984</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151569#M986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;but above you did not mention it being used on the inter-site link, so let me rephrase my question: do I need to add 370x to the allowed VLAN list for the inter-site sync?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:49:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151569#M986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:49:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151570#M987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I suppose correction layer communication should remain only in active site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:52:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151570#M987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:52:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151571#M988</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, because we do not run correction traffic between sites&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/151571#M988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T10:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/155967#M1133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FYI -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk168092&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Quantum" target="_self"&gt;sk168092&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;was finally updated:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;===&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If Orchestrators are connected via external switches, ports on the external switches must be configured accordingly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In versions lower than R81.10, external switches&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;must&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;support 802.1ad ("QinQ") and allow packets with more than 1 VLAN tag. It&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;must&amp;nbsp;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;remove any of the existing VLAN tags.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In version R81.10 there is an option to disable QnQ encapsulation. In this case you have to trunk all Sync vlans (380x) of all security groups all the way between sites.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;===&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/155967#M1133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Szydelko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-30T10:28:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro R81.10 QinQ requirement for Dual site through external L2 switches</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/156043#M1134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about cli command &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk168092&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Quantum" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;sk168092&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;how to disable &lt;SPAN&gt;QinQ encapsulation on MHOs &lt;/SPAN&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 06:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-R81-10-QinQ-requirement-for-Dual-site-through-external/m-p/156043#M1134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nazarii_Makohin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-31T06:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

