<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISP Redundancy on Maestro VSX in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/ISP-Redundancy-on-Maestro-VSX/m-p/150119#M934</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm planning to migrate a VSX R80.20 to VSX R81 (or R81.10) on Maestro. My customer require a solution for ISP Redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually he have to change manually the default route in case of failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 2 different vlan that connect to 2 different path to internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking online I found that ISP Redundancy is not supported on VSX (sk79700) but in some other document (sk148074 , check this MBS-13348) seems to be supported in Maestro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you help me to understand what's the solution to solve this? If PBR can solve it's ok for me to implement them &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;M&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:36:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marco32</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-03T10:36:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP Redundancy on Maestro VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/ISP-Redundancy-on-Maestro-VSX/m-p/150119#M934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm planning to migrate a VSX R80.20 to VSX R81 (or R81.10) on Maestro. My customer require a solution for ISP Redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually he have to change manually the default route in case of failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 2 different vlan that connect to 2 different path to internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking online I found that ISP Redundancy is not supported on VSX (sk79700) but in some other document (sk148074 , check this MBS-13348) seems to be supported in Maestro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you help me to understand what's the solution to solve this? If PBR can solve it's ok for me to implement them &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;M&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:36:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/ISP-Redundancy-on-Maestro-VSX/m-p/150119#M934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-03T10:36:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

