<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/146370#M880</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&amp;nbsp; The command is also helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Todd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2022 07:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-17T07:34:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145237#M862</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Expert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We just win a project to implement single site Maestro, 2 MHO-140 and 3 SG6600.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From maestro getting started guide, it shows both MHOs is connected to a single switch or a vPC switch.&amp;nbsp; But our customer environment is a dual layer2 switch and don't support vPC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you help us confirmed MHO Uplink bond interface can operate in Active/Backup mode? And the topology is workable ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Todd&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 12:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145237#M862</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-01T12:36:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145276#M864</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes active/backup on a bond is possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145276#M864</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-01T19:25:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145280#M865</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That looks correct to me.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 01:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145280#M865</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-02T01:39:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145285#M866</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One more Question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the attached picture,&amp;nbsp; when one of the MHO Active uplink is down, will traffic go to the other MHO ? Am I making the right assumption ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Todd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 03:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145285#M866</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-02T03:23:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145286#M867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Logically yes, that would be my assumption as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 04:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/145286#M867</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-02T04:23:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/146368#M879</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it did function just as you say.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you can want to figure out which uplink interface is active in each bond interface, you can try to use this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@XXXXXX-ch01-01:0]# more /proc/net/bonding/bond*| grep Current&lt;BR /&gt;Currently Active Slave: eth2-21&lt;BR /&gt;Currently Active Slave: eth2-23&lt;BR /&gt;Currently Active Slave: eth1-25&lt;BR /&gt;Currently Active Slave: eth2-27&lt;BR /&gt;Currently Active Slave: eth2-29&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eth1 is an MHO-1 uplink interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eth2 is an MHO-2 unlink interface&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2022 02:06:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/146368#M879</guid>
      <dc:creator>RickLin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-17T02:06:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/146370#M880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&amp;nbsp; The command is also helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Todd&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2022 07:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-140-Uplink-topology/m-p/146370#M880</guid>
      <dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-17T07:34:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

