<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SND Adjacency in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SND-Adjacency/m-p/138065#M710</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got 3 x 6400s in one SG&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Core i3-8100 CPU&amp;nbsp;@ 3.6GHz,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;4 cores&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For performance reasons, the CoreXL allocation has just been modified to add 1 additional SND resulting in a 2/2 split (default 1/3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the change following reboot of each SGM, I notice the SND core allocations are not adjacent i.e. CPU 0/CPU2 (fw workers CPU1/CPU3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure the SNDs to be adjacent i.e. CPU0/CPU1 to take advantage of fast memory caches (Layer 2 fast cache) and pre-fetching?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simon_Macpherso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-11T06:56:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SND Adjacency</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SND-Adjacency/m-p/138065#M710</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got 3 x 6400s in one SG&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Core i3-8100 CPU&amp;nbsp;@ 3.6GHz,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;4 cores&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For performance reasons, the CoreXL allocation has just been modified to add 1 additional SND resulting in a 2/2 split (default 1/3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the change following reboot of each SGM, I notice the SND core allocations are not adjacent i.e. CPU 0/CPU2 (fw workers CPU1/CPU3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure the SNDs to be adjacent i.e. CPU0/CPU1 to take advantage of fast memory caches (Layer 2 fast cache) and pre-fetching?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SND-Adjacency/m-p/138065#M710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon_Macpherso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-11T06:56:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SND Adjacency</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SND-Adjacency/m-p/138066#M711</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can set the affinity of the 2 fw workers in the&amp;nbsp;$FWDIR/conf/fwaffinity.conf Configuration File&lt;SPAN&gt; to be adjacent&lt;/SPAN&gt;, see&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="Book_Variablestp_full_book_title"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Book_Variables_PTG.tp_full_book_title variable"&gt;Performance Tuning R81.10 Administration Guide ! So SNDs get the other two&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;adjacent&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;CPUs as you want it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SND-Adjacency/m-p/138066#M711</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-11T15:33:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

