<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro g_tcpdump performance impact? in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131822#M647</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The best way to get an official statement from Check Point is to open a TAC case or to contact your local office.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That said, I understand that asking in the community is much more convenient &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;can you assist here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-15T09:41:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro g_tcpdump performance impact?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131816#M644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In a Maestro environment with 100 GBit/s interfaces (uplink and downlink) and a high packet rate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can running g_tcpdump have a performance impact on the Maestro environment?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think first yes, because all informations are forwarded into a ssh user session.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can cppcap be used here as an alternative?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any information on this from Check Point: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1009" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;@Laszlo_Csosza&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131816#M644</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-15T12:03:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro g_tcpdump performance impact?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131819#M645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;cppcap was designed to help limit the performance impact on a firewall while taking a capture, so I'd imagine it would be preferable to tcpdump in your scenario.&amp;nbsp; But let's ask the creator of cppcap,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24548"&gt;@Aviad_Hadarian&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131819#M645</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-15T09:26:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro g_tcpdump performance impact?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131820#M646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, I am aware of the information.&lt;BR /&gt;I need a statement for Maestro from Check Point, which is the best way to debug connections in real time without performance impact.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131820#M646</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-15T09:34:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro g_tcpdump performance impact?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131822#M647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The best way to get an official statement from Check Point is to open a TAC case or to contact your local office.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That said, I understand that asking in the community is much more convenient &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;can you assist here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-g-tcpdump-performance-impact/m-p/131822#M647</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-15T09:41:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

