<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro - Dual Side Question? in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116675#M473</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9262"&gt;@Kim_Moberg&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for the answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is not a question about a down link but about an "inter-side-sync" link over a switch from&amp;nbsp; datacenter 1 to datacenter 2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-22T19:33:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro - Dual Side Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116647#M471</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check Point support L2 connectivity via switches for dual side integration, however, it must support Q-in-Q as well.&lt;BR /&gt;Latency requirement is &amp;lt;100ms and &amp;lt;5% loss.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Maestro_1.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/11478i95D2DBEAC6A64C37/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Maestro_1.png" alt="Maestro_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now my questions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;In all documentation I only found the following IP scheme. Can this be changed on the orchestrator side? The background to the question is that the customer uses 192.0.2.0/24 this network and would like to use other IP's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;I can change the "inter-side-sync" with the following command:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; set maestro port 1/47/1 type site_sync&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; set maestro configuration orchestrator-site-vlan 1000&lt;BR /&gt;I would also define a trunk port on the cisco switch and add VLAN 1000 (red arrow in the picture).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;SECTION class="pEx1_Example1"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; switch# configure terminal&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; switch(config)# interface ethernet 3/1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; switch(config-if)# switchport trunk allow vlan 1000&lt;/SECTION&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;Is that all or is there more to configure here on orchestrator and cisco side.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116647#M471</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T15:15:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro - Dual Side Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116653#M472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Heiko, AFAIK the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;192.0.2.0/24 representative SGM internal vlan without affecting you existing network. this is network between your MHO and SGM downlinks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="D8EBA5E4-9304-4895-81E4-B76159E3BDB6.jpeg" style="width: 828px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/11479i7A478322721EE9E7/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="D8EBA5E4-9304-4895-81E4-B76159E3BDB6.jpeg" alt="D8EBA5E4-9304-4895-81E4-B76159E3BDB6.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;maybe other Maestro users know more about this&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:41:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116653#M472</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kim_Moberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T15:41:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro - Dual Side Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116675#M473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9262"&gt;@Kim_Moberg&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for the answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is not a question about a down link but about an "inter-side-sync" link over a switch from&amp;nbsp; datacenter 1 to datacenter 2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116675#M473</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T19:33:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro - Dual Side Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116716#M474</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21670"&gt;@HeikoAnkenbrand&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe the Cisco config is missing the QinQ and LLDP tunnelling, should be something like below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface EthX/Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switchport access vlan xyz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switchport mode dot1q-tunnel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;l2protocol tunnel all (or you can limit to the appropriate ones for you).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if the 192.0.2.0/24 addresses are changeable but not supposed to participate in any routing outside the MHO...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Dual-Side-Question/m-p/116716#M474</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex_Shpilman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-23T10:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

