<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Maestro NAT validation error after upgrade in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282832#M4418</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;After performing a supported upgrade of our Management from R81.20 → R82 (latest JHF), we are unable to create a new NAT rule. This is because the upgraded Maestro objects instantly cause a validation error as soon as we add them to the 'Install On' field:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Maestro_NAT_error.png" style="width: 306px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35390i428BF4E14D39101B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Maestro_NAT_error.png" alt="Maestro_NAT_error.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Overview:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD style="background-color: #ff91af;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Location&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="background-color: #ff91af;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Type&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="background-color: #ff91af;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Result&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;NAT rule 'Install On'&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Newly created Maestro object&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT color="#339966"&gt;No issue&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;NAT rule 'Install On'&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Upgraded Maestro object&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;Validation error&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We opened a service request (SR#: 6-0004502699) at the beginning of 2026 and escalated it several times, but the only answer we got is to delete all affected Maestro objects and to recreate them, which would cause a huge impact (SIC &amp;amp; topology reset and more) and put our production to a high risk and longer outages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did anyone experience the same or knows of a solution?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1967"&gt;@Lari_Luoma&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2895"&gt;@Tom_Kendrick&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1009"&gt;@Laszlo_Csosza&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5357"&gt;@Jochen_Hoechner&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4134"&gt;@Tom_Hartig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-25T19:21:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro NAT validation error after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282832#M4418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After performing a supported upgrade of our Management from R81.20 → R82 (latest JHF), we are unable to create a new NAT rule. This is because the upgraded Maestro objects instantly cause a validation error as soon as we add them to the 'Install On' field:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Maestro_NAT_error.png" style="width: 306px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35390i428BF4E14D39101B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Maestro_NAT_error.png" alt="Maestro_NAT_error.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Overview:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD style="background-color: #ff91af;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Location&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="background-color: #ff91af;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Type&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD style="background-color: #ff91af;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Result&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;NAT rule 'Install On'&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Newly created Maestro object&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT color="#339966"&gt;No issue&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;NAT rule 'Install On'&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Upgraded Maestro object&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;Validation error&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We opened a service request (SR#: 6-0004502699) at the beginning of 2026 and escalated it several times, but the only answer we got is to delete all affected Maestro objects and to recreate them, which would cause a huge impact (SIC &amp;amp; topology reset and more) and put our production to a high risk and longer outages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did anyone experience the same or knows of a solution?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1967"&gt;@Lari_Luoma&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2895"&gt;@Tom_Kendrick&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1009"&gt;@Laszlo_Csosza&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5357"&gt;@Jochen_Hoechner&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4134"&gt;@Tom_Hartig&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282832#M4418</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-25T19:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro NAT validation error after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282875#M4421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this a regular gateway object to represent the SMO or is this something else?&lt;BR /&gt;We'd likely be getting into guidbedit territory here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282875#M4421</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-25T19:08:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro NAT validation error after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282878#M4422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's a normal Maestro SMO object. I hope the error can be fixed via GuiDBEdit.&lt;BR /&gt;Neither TAC nor R&amp;amp;D didn't look into this direction ever since we opened the SR.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282878#M4422</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-25T19:17:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro NAT validation error after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282888#M4423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I haven't seen this issue. If the object is normal SGW object, opening a TAC case (which you did) is the correct next step.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 01:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-NAT-validation-error-after-upgrade/m-p/282888#M4423</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lari_Luoma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-26T01:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

