<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 80.30SP and VPN routing in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/109732#M413</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are hitting this limitations in Maestro architecture :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk148074" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk148074&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It is not supported to configure a Scalable Platform 40000 / 60000 object or a Maestro Security Group object as a VPN Satellite Gateway if other VPN peers communicate through it.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It is not supported to configure Client to Site traffic over the Site-to-Site VPN tunnel with a a Scalable Platform 40000 / 60000 or a Maestro Security Group.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are redirecting the remote access traffic to a site to site VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="uiOutputText"&gt;Client VPN &amp;lt;====Remoteaccess===&amp;gt; 80.30SP&amp;lt; ====SITE 2 SITE VPN======&amp;gt; Azure GW &amp;lt;--VNET--&amp;gt; Server&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SG don't like and break TCP session. It's not supported&amp;nbsp; yet, there is an RFE coming.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However do you have an idea as a workaroud?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We were thinking NATting the remote access traffic behind a pool before sending it to the VPN ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:57:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeanbruno</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-03T20:57:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>80.30SP and VPN routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/109732#M413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are hitting this limitations in Maestro architecture :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk148074" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk148074&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It is not supported to configure a Scalable Platform 40000 / 60000 object or a Maestro Security Group object as a VPN Satellite Gateway if other VPN peers communicate through it.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It is not supported to configure Client to Site traffic over the Site-to-Site VPN tunnel with a a Scalable Platform 40000 / 60000 or a Maestro Security Group.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are redirecting the remote access traffic to a site to site VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="uiOutputText"&gt;Client VPN &amp;lt;====Remoteaccess===&amp;gt; 80.30SP&amp;lt; ====SITE 2 SITE VPN======&amp;gt; Azure GW &amp;lt;--VNET--&amp;gt; Server&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SG don't like and break TCP session. It's not supported&amp;nbsp; yet, there is an RFE coming.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However do you have an idea as a workaroud?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We were thinking NATting the remote access traffic behind a pool before sending it to the VPN ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:57:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/109732#M413</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeanbruno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-03T20:57:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 80.30SP and VPN routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110454#M415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i got the answer from Check Point, it's not supported on 80.30SP . A hotfix is needed with RFE...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sk147033&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:39:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110454#M415</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeanbruno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T14:39:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 80.30SP and VPN routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110456#M416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51665"&gt;@jeanbruno&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Very interesting. We also have a customer with a migrated Maestro installation with a setup similar to this you described.&lt;BR /&gt;We see packet drops after 50s (TCP End Timer value) on the packets coming from the server back to the client.&lt;BR /&gt;You can see it with "g_fw ctl zdebug drop | grep &amp;lt;hidenat-ip-fw&amp;gt;"&lt;BR /&gt;Strange is that the drops are intermittent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Workaround for now is a incoming fw rule which allows any traffic from server to vpn-client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have the same behavior at your installation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110456#M416</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Baumann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T14:43:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 80.30SP and VPN routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110457#M417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Peter,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version are you running?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got bad TCP séquences,first SYN not seen. UDP seemed ok. i didnt do zdebug drop cause TAC confirmed the not supported topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Client to Site Traffic over Site to Site VPN Tunnel is supported only in 81.10 according to CP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110457#M417</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeanbruno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T14:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 80.30SP and VPN routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110466#M418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51665"&gt;@jeanbruno&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Customer is using R80.30SP with JHF which exactly I cannot see since I have no access to the fw right now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110466#M418</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Baumann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T15:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 80.30SP and VPN routing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110467#M419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok maybe same troubles than us. If you want full VPN support on 80.30SP you need to contact your sales CP and ask for the hotfix though RFE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And it can be installed only on top of Jumbo take 47.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/80-30SP-and-VPN-routing/m-p/110467#M419</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeanbruno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T15:57:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

