<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sync Port Redundancy in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Sync-Port-Redundancy/m-p/101261#M360</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm if sync port redundancy is now supported and have tested it in lab or production? i.e. enable an additional port e.g. port 47, in each MHO-140 orchestrator as a sync port to the default sync port 48.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears to have been introduced in&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Take 210 (05 Jan 2020) via ID MBS-7993&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Enhancement&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Added the ability to configure multiple physical ports as the Sync port on Maestro Orchestrator. Configuration is performed from Gaia Clish on the Maestro Orchestrator.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To configure multiple ports for the Internal Sync (between Orchestrators on the same site)&amp;nbsp;run: '&lt;EM&gt;set maestro port &amp;lt;port number&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; type ssm_sync&lt;/EM&gt;'&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To configure multiple ports for the External Sync (between Orchestrators on different sites) run: 's&lt;EM&gt;et maestro port &amp;lt;port number&amp;gt; type site_sync&lt;/EM&gt;'&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 x MHO-140 running R80.20SP GA take 295&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 x 6200 Plus Gateways running R80.30SP GA take 49&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Simon_Macpherso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-05T23:25:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sync Port Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Sync-Port-Redundancy/m-p/101261#M360</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm if sync port redundancy is now supported and have tested it in lab or production? i.e. enable an additional port e.g. port 47, in each MHO-140 orchestrator as a sync port to the default sync port 48.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears to have been introduced in&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Take 210 (05 Jan 2020) via ID MBS-7993&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" width="100%" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Enhancement&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Added the ability to configure multiple physical ports as the Sync port on Maestro Orchestrator. Configuration is performed from Gaia Clish on the Maestro Orchestrator.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To configure multiple ports for the Internal Sync (between Orchestrators on the same site)&amp;nbsp;run: '&lt;EM&gt;set maestro port &amp;lt;port number&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; type ssm_sync&lt;/EM&gt;'&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To configure multiple ports for the External Sync (between Orchestrators on different sites) run: 's&lt;EM&gt;et maestro port &amp;lt;port number&amp;gt; type site_sync&lt;/EM&gt;'&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 x MHO-140 running R80.20SP GA take 295&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 x 6200 Plus Gateways running R80.30SP GA take 49&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Sync-Port-Redundancy/m-p/101261#M360</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simon_Macpherso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-05T23:25:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sync Port Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Sync-Port-Redundancy/m-p/101265#M363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For those reading at home MHO Sync is different than traditional Sync and more relevant in multi-site deployments since their it is the only path between SGMs at the other location.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Sync-Port-Redundancy/m-p/101265#M363</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-06T00:04:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

