<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro MVC CCME question in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/246707#M3331</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Warning&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;-&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Multi-Version Cluster&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;(&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Zero Downtime&lt;/SPAN&gt;) upgrade from&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;R81&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;R81.20&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;is&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;supported if a&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Security Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;has Bond interfaces in the 802.3ad (LACP) mode on Uplink ports (Known Limitation PMTR-88191).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another thing to note:&amp;nbsp; I did a handful of R81.10 to R81.20 Maestro upgrades early fall 2024. This warning applies to R81.10 as well as R81.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 21:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nicholas_Cuba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-16T21:56:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro MVC CCME question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/229648#M2916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, ill be sitting the CCME exam this week and I have conflicting information in regards to a test question "During an upgrade is Multi Version cluster supported"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The course documentation states:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If this is a major version upgrade, such as upgrading from R80.30SP to R81.10, there is a non-stateful failover from the original version into the newly&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;upgraded version. All open connections are dropped by the newly upgraded SGMs when failover occurs.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Although with R80.40 Multi-Version Clustering (MVC) or full connectivity upgrade was released, Maestro does not support MVC.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;To blunt this impact as much as possible and allow most connections to survive this event, in SmartConsole Global Properties under Stateful Inspection, disable drop out of state TCP packets. Prior to beginning the upgrade, re-install the Access Control Policy on the SG.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the upgrade guide&amp;nbsp; (&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Maestro_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Maestro-AG/Upgrading-Maestro-Zero-Downtime-MVC.htm?Highlight=multi%20cluster" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Maestro_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Maestro-AG/Upgrading-Maestro-Zero-Downtime-MVC.htm?Highlight=multi%20cluster&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;States:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;This section describes the steps for upgrading a&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_ScalablePlatforms.tp_maestro variable"&gt;Maestro&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;environment (the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_ScalablePlatforms.tp_mhos variable"&gt;Quantum Maestro Orchestrators&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_sgs variable"&gt;Security Groups&lt;/SPAN&gt;) with&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_zero_downtime_full variable"&gt;Zero Downtime&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;- as a&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_mvc_full variable"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;Multi&lt;/SPAN&gt;-Version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight2"&gt;Cluster&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_mvc_short variable"&gt;MVC&lt;/SPAN&gt;).&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;This procedure supports only these upgrade paths for&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_sgs variable"&gt;Security Groups&lt;/SPAN&gt;:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Upgrade of a&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_sg variable"&gt;Security Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ignis variable"&gt;R81.10&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ivory variable"&gt;R81.20&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Upgrade of a&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_sg variable"&gt;Security Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ice variable"&gt;R81&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ivory variable"&gt;R81.20&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Warning"&gt;Warning&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;-&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_mvc_full variable"&gt;Multi-Version Cluster&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;(&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_zero_downtime_full variable"&gt;Zero Downtime&lt;/SPAN&gt;) upgrade from&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Versions.r_ice variable"&gt;R81&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Book_Variables_Common.tp_cpversion variable"&gt;R81.20&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;is&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;supported if a&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_Other.tp_sg variable"&gt;Security Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;has Bond interfaces in the 802.3ad (LACP) mode on Uplink ports (Known Limitation PMTR-88191).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/229648#M2916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ryan_Ryan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-14T21:33:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro MVC CCME question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/229658#M2917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The example given in the courseware is correct: you can't use MVC to go from R80.30SP to R81.10.&lt;BR /&gt;You can, however, use MVC on Maestro starting from R81.&lt;BR /&gt;So the answer is...version dependent.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/229658#M2917</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-14T23:45:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro MVC CCME question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/229681#M2918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Full MVC support was not added to Maestro until R81.20; see sk148074.&amp;nbsp; The current Maestro exam was written for version R81.10.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Starting in R81 there was an MVC-like mechanism for upgrades into R81.10 and R81.20, and it was separately documented in the Maestro admin guide.&amp;nbsp; It was quite involved and not nearly as seamless as a regular MVC upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:25:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/229681#M2918</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T13:25:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro MVC CCME question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/231137#M2925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14416"&gt;@Ryan_Ryan&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In my view, this is also a somewhat dubious question;-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I agree with &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had to think about this question for a very long time in the CCME R81 exam.&lt;BR /&gt;I then decided that MVC is not possible in R81.10.&lt;BR /&gt;As I have reached 100% in the upgrade area, I assume that the answer is correct.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="M1_ghkdgh.jpg" style="width: 571px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28251i60FDF8DBFB47749C/image-dimensions/571x180?v=v2" width="571" height="180" role="button" title="M1_ghkdgh.jpg" alt="M1_ghkdgh.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6667"&gt;@Jason_Tugwell&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; can say something about it;-)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/231137#M2925</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-29T12:20:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro MVC CCME question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/246707#M3331</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Warning&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;-&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Multi-Version Cluster&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;(&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Zero Downtime&lt;/SPAN&gt;) upgrade from&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;R81&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;R81.20&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;is&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;supported if a&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Security Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;has Bond interfaces in the 802.3ad (LACP) mode on Uplink ports (Known Limitation PMTR-88191).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another thing to note:&amp;nbsp; I did a handful of R81.10 to R81.20 Maestro upgrades early fall 2024. This warning applies to R81.10 as well as R81.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 21:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-MVC-CCME-question/m-p/246707#M3331</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicholas_Cuba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-16T21:56:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

