<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro Local ARP in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97215#M295</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I didn't run that command, but ran&amp;nbsp;#&lt;EM&gt;local_arp_update&lt;/EM&gt; and confirmed the same entries exist in local.arp on both chassis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Raj_Khatri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-21T19:28:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/96874#M293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently migrated over to a new Maestro cluster running MHO-140s and SG6800s.&amp;nbsp; Noticed the system diagnostics is failing only on the "Local ARP" test.&amp;nbsp; Not facing any issues but want to get to the bottom of clearing this up.&amp;nbsp; A few proxy ARP entries have been added to the security group and confirmed the entries exist in $FWDIR/conf/local.arp on both chassis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Running R80.20 SP with Take 279&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;#&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;asg_local_arp_verifier&amp;nbsp; output results in the following -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Starting local.arp verification on local chassis... (Chassis 1)&lt;BR /&gt;- file local.arp is identical on all blades (OK)&lt;BR /&gt;-*- 2 blades: 1_01 1_02 -*-&lt;BR /&gt;- arp_table is not identical on all blades:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- MAC integrity check passed on all blades (OK)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error: Problem found in configuration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have several bonded interfaces and there is no issue with that test w/LACP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/96874#M293</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raj_Khatri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-16T18:01:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/96926#M294</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hmm, we don't have any manual ARP entries, so I guess that's why it passes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;asg diag print 26&lt;BR /&gt;==============================&lt;BR /&gt;Local ARP:&lt;BR /&gt;==============================&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Starting local.arp verification on local chassis... (Chassis 1)&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/CPsuite-R80.20/fw1/conf/local.arp is not configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Starting local.arp verification on remote chassis... (Chassis 2)&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/CPsuite-R80.20/fw1/conf/local.arp is not configured&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/CPsuite-R80.20/fw1/conf/local.arp is not configured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configuration is OK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you use, asg_cp2blades to copy the file across the appliances or edited the file manually on each one ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:28:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/96926#M294</guid>
      <dc:creator>funkylicious</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-17T10:28:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97215#M295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I didn't run that command, but ran&amp;nbsp;#&lt;EM&gt;local_arp_update&lt;/EM&gt; and confirmed the same entries exist in local.arp on both chassis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97215#M295</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raj_Khatri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-21T19:28:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97243#M296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Maybe you should stop editing the local.arp file all together and start using the (g)clish command for it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;add arp proxy ipv4-address 123.45.67.89 macaddress 00-12-34-00-56-67 real-ipv4-address 123.45.67.90&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 05:57:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97243#M296</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-22T05:57:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97308#M297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The changes were made from WebUI followed by a policy install.&amp;nbsp; Confirmed via CLI that local.arp exists on both members.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;show configuration arp proxy&lt;BR /&gt;add arp proxy ipv4-address 1.2.3.4 interface bond1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97308#M297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raj_Khatri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-22T18:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97706#M298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Raj,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same issue (MHO-140 + 2 members and proxy-arp). I was told by Check Point employee this is a known issue and should be fixed in the next jumbo hotfix.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97706#M298</guid>
      <dc:creator>mk1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-28T12:25:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro Local ARP</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97758#M299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I just got the same word as well that it will be in the next R80.20 jumbo due out early October.&amp;nbsp; Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-Local-ARP/m-p/97758#M299</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raj_Khatri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-29T00:26:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

