<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MHO cluster in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214275#M2579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It is recommended that the same models are used so that you have the same capabilities on both sides and full HA. but mix&amp;amp;match rules apply if you want to use different models.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 02:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-15T02:35:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MHO cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214124#M2574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We currently have three Check Point Maestro MHO-140 appliances.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Two are deployed in an active-active cluster at our main data center for redundancy,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; while the third serves as a spare.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We'd like to explore the possibility of utilizing the spare MHO appliance at our Disaster Recovery (DR) site.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Since all three appliances are the same model,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; we'd like to confirm if it's feasible to:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Deploy one MHO at the DR site:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Can we establish a cluster between the active MHOs in the main data center and the MHO deployed at the DR site?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cluster configuration:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Is it possible to configure this cluster in either active-active or active-standby mode for optimal redundancy at both locations?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please advise on the supportability and recommended configuration for this scenario.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 08:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214124#M2574</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ihenock1011</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T08:19:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MHO cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214127#M2575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MHOs are not clustered like gateways are. They provide a form of active/active high availability when architected appropriately (all uplinks bonded across both MHOs) but they are functionally independent devices who sync a bit of configuration, and pass packets down to the SGMs / out to the network switches as they come in and out.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When looking to set up a Dual-Site architecture, you need the same amount of MHOs on both sites. So you'd have to add a fourth MHO to your setup if you wanted to move to this. You would then also have to move/add SGMs to that site before you can use that second site. A dual-site Security Group should have the same amount of SGMs on both sites in order to achieve HA, as they form an Active/Standby setup across the two sites. All SGMs in site 1 are active and all SGMs in site 2 are standby, until a failover event occurs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 08:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214127#M2575</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T08:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MHO cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214132#M2576</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MHO have to be mirrored on both sites, if you are planning to have dual site, the site two must have the same set up on MHO as primary have, if you have 2 MHO on site 1 you need 2 on site 2, you can't have 2 on site 1 and 1 on site 2. that is not supported.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 09:03:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214132#M2576</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dario_Perez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T09:03:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MHO cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214147#M2577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/71054"&gt;@emmap&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3205"&gt;@Dario_Perez&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Does the SGMs must be the same model for example if we have 7K series in site 1 SG-01 and in site 2 the same model must be used ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 12:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214147#M2577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ihenock1011</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T12:39:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MHO cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214275#M2579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is recommended that the same models are used so that you have the same capabilities on both sides and full HA. but mix&amp;amp;match rules apply if you want to use different models.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 02:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-cluster/m-p/214275#M2579</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-15T02:35:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

