<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213256#M2553</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response, unfortunately this did not resolve the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the following output is of any use?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Global] x-FW-IT-ch01-02&amp;gt; fw stat&lt;BR /&gt;Fetching data from blades...&lt;BR /&gt;formatting data...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;HOST&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; POLICY&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; DATE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1_01&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; x_TEST_Policy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6May2024 12:11:40&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp; [&amp;gt;Sync] [&amp;lt;Sync] [&amp;gt;bond30.906] [&amp;lt;bond30.906] [&amp;gt;bond30.903] [&amp;lt;bond30.903] [&amp;gt;bond10.901] [&amp;lt;bond10.901] [&amp;gt;bond30.905] [&amp;lt;bond30.905] [&amp;gt;bond40.940] [&amp;lt;bond40.940] [&amp;gt;bond30.902] [&amp;lt;bond30.902] [&amp;gt;bond30.904] [&amp;lt;bond30.904]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1_02&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; x_TEST_Policy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6May2024 12:11:27&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp; [&amp;gt;Sync] [&amp;lt;Sync] [&amp;gt;bond10.901] [&amp;lt;bond10.901] [&amp;gt;bond30.905] [&amp;gt;bond40.940]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I lack the understanding to know what this means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDIT: I have just noticed that the racking team has slot MHO-1 ports in BP 2-4 and MHO-2 ports in BP 1-3 with MHO-1 having been staged as the primary orchestrator. Everything else appears operational, could it be that its trying to sync its routes as the active SMO to the SGM to BP2-4, which currently is itself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDIT2: Other appliance links are unstable and frequently being physically disconnected that are bonded to both MHOs, could this disturb the route syncing process?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 13:32:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-06T13:32:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213253#M2551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello CheckMates!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you once again for taking the time to entertain my question. I am currently experiencing problems having the other SGMs learn the routes from the SMO-Master and would like to verify if this is normal behavior or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When showing the output of netstat -rn, I can verify that the SMO-Master has received all BGP routes. However, the SGMs are only showing their directly connected and static routes, is this normal behavior? When using traceroute to test, we can see that every connection handled by SGMs other than the SMO-Master will be thrown towards the default-route, where as the ones handled by the SMO-Master will be handled according to the routing table learned via BGP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have rebooted the SGMs and taken them out of the SG and back in with the issue not resolving. The GAIA configuration includes ip-reachability and local-address incase this is an obscure issue. The SD-WAN connection is using md5 authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;example:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65300 peer 10.38.243.73 on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65300 peer 10.38.243.73 local-address 10.38.243.74 on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65300 peer 10.38.243.73 ip-reachability-detection on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65300 peer 10.38.243.81 on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65300 peer 10.38.243.81 local-address 10.38.243.82 on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65300 peer 10.38.243.81 ip-reachability-detection on&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this is sufficient information to send me in the right direction before opening a support ticket.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your input!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 09:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213253#M2551</guid>
      <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-06T09:43:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213255#M2552</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any routes learned via BGP should be sent to all the other SGMs, so this isn't normal behaviour.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Saying that, when I look at the routing admin guide, it states that: If running BGP in a cluster you must not configure the local address. So that might be breaking something.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 09:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213255#M2552</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-06T09:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213256#M2553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response, unfortunately this did not resolve the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the following output is of any use?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Global] x-FW-IT-ch01-02&amp;gt; fw stat&lt;BR /&gt;Fetching data from blades...&lt;BR /&gt;formatting data...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;HOST&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; POLICY&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; DATE&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1_01&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; x_TEST_Policy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6May2024 12:11:40&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp; [&amp;gt;Sync] [&amp;lt;Sync] [&amp;gt;bond30.906] [&amp;lt;bond30.906] [&amp;gt;bond30.903] [&amp;lt;bond30.903] [&amp;gt;bond10.901] [&amp;lt;bond10.901] [&amp;gt;bond30.905] [&amp;lt;bond30.905] [&amp;gt;bond40.940] [&amp;lt;bond40.940] [&amp;gt;bond30.902] [&amp;lt;bond30.902] [&amp;gt;bond30.904] [&amp;lt;bond30.904]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1_02&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; x_TEST_Policy&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6May2024 12:11:27&amp;nbsp; :&amp;nbsp; [&amp;gt;Sync] [&amp;lt;Sync] [&amp;gt;bond10.901] [&amp;lt;bond10.901] [&amp;gt;bond30.905] [&amp;gt;bond40.940]&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I lack the understanding to know what this means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDIT: I have just noticed that the racking team has slot MHO-1 ports in BP 2-4 and MHO-2 ports in BP 1-3 with MHO-1 having been staged as the primary orchestrator. Everything else appears operational, could it be that its trying to sync its routes as the active SMO to the SGM to BP2-4, which currently is itself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDIT2: Other appliance links are unstable and frequently being physically disconnected that are bonded to both MHOs, could this disturb the route syncing process?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 13:32:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213256#M2553</guid>
      <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-06T13:32:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213425#M2554</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MHO 1 must be plugged into ports 1 and 3 on the line card and MHO into ports 2 and 4. This being wrong certainly won't be helping things so I'd suggest fixing that as a priority before spending too much time on this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Uplinks going up and down shouldn't affect the route sync'ing but if an interface is down its associated routes may not be reflected in the kernel routing table.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 02:05:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/213425#M2554</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-07T02:05:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215448#M2607</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Everything is cabled properly now, the entire network works. However, when I add another SGM to the cluster it is not receiving the learned BGP routes from the SMO Master.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried to restart BGP, this did not resolve the issue. I have let it be part of the cluster in active state for over 20 minutes before removing it due to network impact.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the configuration output with some redactions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show configuration bgp&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp graceful-restart restart-time 360&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp graceful-restart selection-deferral-time 360&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65509 on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65509 peer 10.38.243.65 on&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65509 peer 10.38.243.65 authtype md5 secret already_scrambled_&lt;BR /&gt;set bgp external remote-as 65509 peer 10.38.243.65&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is Check Point CPinfo Build 914000239 for GAIA&lt;BR /&gt;[IDA]&lt;BR /&gt;No hotfixes..&lt;BR /&gt;[CPFC]&lt;BR /&gt;No hotfixes..&lt;BR /&gt;[FW1]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 53&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R80_40_MAAS_TUNNEL_AUTOUPDATE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW1 build number:&lt;BR /&gt;This is Check Point's software version R81.20 - Build 024&lt;BR /&gt;kernel: R81.20 - Build 032&lt;BR /&gt;[SecurePlatform]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 53&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_ENDER_V17_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;[SMO]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 53&lt;BR /&gt;[CPinfo]&lt;BR /&gt;No hotfixes..&lt;BR /&gt;[PPACK]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 53&lt;BR /&gt;[AutoUpdater]&lt;BR /&gt;No hotfixes..&lt;BR /&gt;[DIAG]&lt;BR /&gt;No hotfixes..&lt;BR /&gt;[CVPN]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 53&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_ESOD_CSHELL_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;[cpsdc_wrapper]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_CPSDC_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;[CPUpdates]&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_CPOTELCOL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 77&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_INFRA_AUTOUPDATE Take: 65&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 53&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_CPSDC_AUTOUPDATE Take: 34&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_DEP_INSTALLER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 27&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_HCP_AUTOUPDATE Take: 70&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_CORE_FILE_UPLOADER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 21&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_R80_40_MAAS_TUNNEL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 60&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_ENDER_V17_AUTOUPDATE Take: 26&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_GENERAL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 18&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_ESOD_CSHELL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 20&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE Take: 128&lt;BR /&gt;BUNDLE_CPVIEWEXPORTER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 34&lt;BR /&gt;[CPotelcol]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_OTLP_GA&lt;BR /&gt;[CPviewExporter]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_OTLP_GA&lt;BR /&gt;[hcp_wrapper]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_HCP_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;[core_uploader]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_CHARON_HF&lt;BR /&gt;[CPDepInst]&lt;BR /&gt;No hotfixes..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 07:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215448#M2607</guid>
      <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-29T07:33:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215455#M2608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What's your route redistribution configuration? Do you have a local AS and router-id configured?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 08:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215455#M2608</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-29T08:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215457#M2609</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;No Router-ID has been configured and is using the default management IP assigned by the SG. See BGP redistribution below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bgp-redistro.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25895iEE62466E782C0943/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bgp-redistro.jpg" alt="bgp-redistro.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bgp-settings.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25896i7D3A9DFFF9045092/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="bgp-settings.jpg" alt="bgp-settings.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit, this appears to be an issue even after installing the policy from the SmartConsole.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;|Summary |&lt;BR /&gt;+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;|Policy Verification completed with the following errors: |&lt;BR /&gt;|1. [1_01:0]: Policy signature doesn't match on all SGMs |&lt;BR /&gt;|2. [1_02:0]: Policy signature doesn't match on all SGMs |&lt;BR /&gt;| |&lt;BR /&gt;+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@ch01-01:0]# asg policy verify -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+----------------------------------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;|Policy Verification |&lt;BR /&gt;+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+&lt;BR /&gt;|SGM |Policy Name |Policy Date |Policy Signature |Status |&lt;BR /&gt;+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+&lt;BR /&gt;|1_01 |TEST_Policy |29May24 11:26 |26176e256 |Failed |&lt;BR /&gt;|1_02 |TEST_Policy |29May24 11:26 |a561d4fa0 |Failed |&lt;BR /&gt;+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried installing the policy without policy acceleration to no success.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 09:53:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215457#M2609</guid>
      <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-29T09:53:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215594#M2611</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Seems like this is a sync issue more than anything else - maybe have a look through the $FWDIR/log/blade_config on both SGMs and see if you can see anything useful. It's a big file, so look for timestamps around when doing policy installs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 02:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/215594#M2611</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-30T02:51:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/217295#M2658</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for all your help. I have resolved the problem. Another administrator had turned off SMO auto-cloning. After enabling auto-cloning, all SGMs work perfectly fine upon joining the cluster.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:38:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/217295#M2658</guid>
      <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-12T14:38:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/217339#M2659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It should work with auto-clone disabled, but it may be that with auto-clone on the second SGM also grabbed patches / something else that resolved the issue. Typically we don't recommend leaving auto-clone enabled once SGMs are introduced into the group and working, for the record.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/217339#M2659</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-13T06:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro BGP - Route Sync Question/Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/217340#M2660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your follow-up recommendation!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-BGP-Route-Sync-Question-Problem/m-p/217340#M2660</guid>
      <dc:creator>HansKazan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-13T06:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

