<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MHO-175 Uplink Interface Speeds in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-175-Uplink-Interface-Speeds/m-p/211828#M2507</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's a cosmetic thing, the physical port speed negotiation is handled at the MHO side and the SGMs just get an interface passed on down. If you check 'orch_stat -p' on the MHOs you'll see the correct speed. The downlinks report correctly because those ports physically exist on the SGMs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't know if there's anything in the works to have the speed listed correctly on the SGMs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-19T07:34:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MHO-175 Uplink Interface Speeds</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-175-Uplink-Interface-Speeds/m-p/211798#M2505</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Afternoon - I have a weird one for the group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are seeing something funky with our MHO-175 uplink ports where they are displaying 10G speeds regardless of any setting setting modifications we make.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setup:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Single Site - 2 x MHO-175 R81.20 - JHF53 on orchestrators and all SGMs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MHO1_physical port-3 (1/3/1)&amp;nbsp; ---------&amp;nbsp; MHO2-175_physical port 3 (2/3/1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;40G - CheckPoint SR optics (using MTP OM4 fiber)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maestro QSFP port settings 40G, admin up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Orch_stat shows&amp;nbsp; 40GSR optics, plugged, up/up - we have link and traffic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*We have these two uplink ports 1/3/1-2/3/1 in an 802.3ad bond (LACP) - bond1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LAN side is using 40G-SR optics and showing 40/40--80G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue we are seeing is the connected Security Group&amp;nbsp; is showing us 10/10--20G when we look at bond1. SNMP is showing us 10G/10G--20G.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The LAN side does seem to have any issues - we moved the LAN side ports to other interfaces, different switch / router platforms, etc - it always shows 40/40--80 and comes up -- the CP side only shows the 10/10--20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We tried new optics on the CP side, tried going only with CP optics on both sides, tried fiber and DAC cabling - no change - 10G/10G--20G on the CP side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The security group is utilizing 40G downlinks - and they are all showing 40.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So then we tried just testing on an empty MHO uplink interface without any bond/ LAG in the mix - enabled the Maestro port at 40G, SR4 - presented it to the Security Group in the Orchestrator - look at the interface from the SecGrp and it shows 'speed N/A' - our SNMP monitoring tools show 10G.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are no configuration options relating to speed, duplex, negotiation for the interface when looking at it on the sec grp - so we cannot manually do anything from the SGMs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And we also noticed that enabling/ disabling auto-negotiation on the Maestro port has no effect on the SGM interface - it always shows on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have made it this far and can follow along, thanks! It is driving us nuts - especially since we are leery about moving traffic to interfaces we are not confident in. Any definitive answer has also eluded our the ATAM engineer we are working with - i figured i would take a shot and see if anyone has seen this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-175-Uplink-Interface-Speeds/m-p/211798#M2505</guid>
      <dc:creator>T_L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-18T20:22:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MHO-175 Uplink Interface Speeds</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-175-Uplink-Interface-Speeds/m-p/211828#M2507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's a cosmetic thing, the physical port speed negotiation is handled at the MHO side and the SGMs just get an interface passed on down. If you check 'orch_stat -p' on the MHOs you'll see the correct speed. The downlinks report correctly because those ports physically exist on the SGMs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't know if there's anything in the works to have the speed listed correctly on the SGMs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/MHO-175-Uplink-Interface-Speeds/m-p/211828#M2507</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-19T07:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

