<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro, magg interface bond. in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88764#M230</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That bug or non supported feature you are refering tothere is for R76SP , Im running R80.20SP. As far as I can see there is no issues as such for the r80 version - and I am also prettu sure I got hide nat working without an issue &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vinceneil666</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-16T11:02:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro, magg interface bond.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88758#M228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While working with Maestro I have created the magg0 interface, the bond for management. This interface is connected to my mgmt subnet where my management, log server and monitoring/backup servers are. - I will assume this is pretty standard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I have come across in some customer enviroments is that this subnet actually also contains a router, and has quite a few other subnets availaable... why this is done, and if it is a good idea is another question - but related to migrating to a maestro solution my question is this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anything besides the magg interface bond is running on a xor lacp setup (bringing the bandwidth down in comparison to the other general bonds for production) that would prevent me from using this as any other interface ? I see that I have the option to add a override on the spoofing and attaching a group for my attached subnets.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So besides a somewhat different lacp setup - is there anything else related to the magg interface that I should consider related to the functionality of the firewall itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(To change the design of the l3 network is of course something I would like to do - but this is a timing issue and will probably trigger a project streching for months. )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88758#M228</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinceneil666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T10:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro, magg interface bond.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88762#M229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually the Magg interface shouldn't be used to route traffic i.e. another device on the same subnet should be the default gateway.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;01800842 -&amp;nbsp;Hide NAT for traffic initiated from the Management interface of Maestro Security Appliances is not supported.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Refer:&amp;nbsp;sk148074&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88762#M229</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T11:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro, magg interface bond.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88764#M230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That bug or non supported feature you are refering tothere is for R76SP , Im running R80.20SP. As far as I can see there is no issues as such for the r80 version - and I am also prettu sure I got hide nat working without an issue &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:02:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88764#M230</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinceneil666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T11:02:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro, magg interface bond.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88765#M231</link>
      <description>Oh, I see that it is still not resolved - my bad ! . thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:09:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-magg-interface-bond/m-p/88765#M231</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinceneil666</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T11:09:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

