<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: question for cabling Maestro in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86825#M221</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2020 04:35:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-31T04:35:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>question for cabling Maestro</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86509#M212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is it mandatory using the same ports on the MHOs connecting the gateways to the MHOs downlinks?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;single site, dual MHOs, two 6000&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;actual configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway01/ Port 1 =&amp;gt; MHO01 / Port 27&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway01 / Port2 =&amp;gt; MHO02 / Port 28&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway02/ Port 1 =&amp;gt; MHO01 / Port 28&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway02 / Port2 =&amp;gt; MHO02 / Port 27&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;normally this should be wired like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway01/ Port 1 =&amp;gt; MHO01 / Port 27&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway01 / Port2 =&amp;gt; MHO02 / Port 27&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway02/ Port 1 =&amp;gt; MHO01 / Port 28&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;gateway02 / Port2 =&amp;gt; MHO02 / Port 28&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At the moment we had no problem, but maybe we should fix this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS.: little mistake from the installation and it will be a lot of time and effort traveling to the remote location &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 15:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86509#M212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T15:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: question for cabling Maestro</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86825#M221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4113"&gt;@Anatoly&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2020 04:35:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86825#M221</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-31T04:35:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: question for cabling Maestro</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86826#M222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, it's not mandatory. You can connect appliances to any of downlink ports. As far as it's defined as downlink, it will work&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2020 04:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/question-for-cabling-Maestro/m-p/86826#M222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-31T04:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

