<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSX: Adding SGMs to active chassis in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/189365#M2157</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;PRJ-48866&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sven_Glock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-14T08:33:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSX: Adding SGMs to active chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/188827#M2151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear community,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to advice you that there is a bug in the "maestro code" that is causing an outage when adding new sgms to the active chassis of an VSX environment.&lt;BR /&gt;The new SGM will be added to the distibution matrix when VS0 is up and running, but this is long before the producition vses are up and running.&lt;BR /&gt;Good workaround is just adding new sgms to the standby chassis only.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will update you once a fix is availabe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Sven&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 21:24:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/188827#M2151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sven_Glock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T21:24:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX: Adding SGMs to active chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/188845#M2152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have seen this type of issue in R81.10 JHF 95 when adding the first SGM only (1_1). Not sure if the problem you are talking about is this one or something different. Please work with TAC to get a fix for the issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 04:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/188845#M2152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lari_Luoma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-08T04:59:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX: Adding SGMs to active chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/188907#M2153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems to be something different. I investigated it with R&amp;amp;D yesterday,&lt;BR /&gt;Already asked for the the task number and let you know once I get an answer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:20:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/188907#M2153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sven_Glock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-08T10:20:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX: Adding SGMs to active chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/189365#M2157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PRJ-48866&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/VSX-Adding-SGMs-to-active-chassis/m-p/189365#M2157</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sven_Glock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-14T08:33:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

