<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic support for 10G downlink in MLS200 ? in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186819#M2113</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible and supported in a Maestro environment to use the 10G trancseivers "CPAC-TR-10SR-ADP" or "CPAC-TR-10LR-ADP" for downlink connections&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;of a MLS200 and MHO-140 or are the 100G downlinks mandatory ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-19T11:13:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>support for 10G downlink in MLS200 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186819#M2113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible and supported in a Maestro environment to use the 10G trancseivers "CPAC-TR-10SR-ADP" or "CPAC-TR-10LR-ADP" for downlink connections&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;of a MLS200 and MHO-140 or are the 100G downlinks mandatory ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186819#M2113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-19T11:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: support for 10G downlink in MLS200 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186852#M2114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To maximize the use of your MLS200 it would be mandatory otherwise you are restricting the throughput. What's the use case to want to connect the appliances in this way?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:21:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186852#M2114</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-19T14:21:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: support for 10G downlink in MLS200 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186857#M2115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Use case will be for a migration project to temporarily connect via existing free 10G ports on a MHO-140. I understand the througput limitation of a 10G downlink but want to know that we have mandatory to start with 100G or can we use the 10G trancseivers with QSFP28 adaptor ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186857#M2115</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-19T14:44:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: support for 10G downlink in MLS200 ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186871#M2116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's somewhat listed in sk92755 but I am checking to confirm.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Feedback was also submitted to correct the missing note reference in the MLS200 / MLS400 table in the same SK.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 02:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/support-for-10G-downlink-in-MLS200/m-p/186871#M2116</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-20T02:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

