<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro design/configuration consideration in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186277#M2099</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;is for High Availability and is not mandatory but is a best practice.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;in case you lost any orch if they are not bonding them would be an outage&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dario_Perez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-12T18:49:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro design/configuration consideration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186275#M2098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems all Maestro documents recommended dual MHO deployment should be vPC and bond.&amp;nbsp; is it possible to have the uplink configured as L3 independently?&amp;nbsp; Is this supported?&amp;nbsp; what are the drawbacks?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186275#M2098</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsitu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T18:41:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro design/configuration consideration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186277#M2099</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;is for High Availability and is not mandatory but is a best practice.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;in case you lost any orch if they are not bonding them would be an outage&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186277#M2099</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dario_Perez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T18:49:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro design/configuration consideration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186289#M2100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you configure your uplink bond interfaces as active/backup you don‘t need vPC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Your draw shows only one SGM, I think it‘s only one for demonstration. Maestro environment with only SGM does not use all the nice features of scalability and redundancy of MAESTRO.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 20:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186289#M2100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T20:05:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro design/configuration consideration</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186295#M2101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you are correct.&amp;nbsp; I only drew a single SGM for illustration purpose.&amp;nbsp; my concern was the uplink configurations.&amp;nbsp; thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 22:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-design-configuration-consideration/m-p/186295#M2101</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsitu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-12T22:14:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

