<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SSM BRIDGE IN CHASSIS 41K in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/48768#M1852</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I need know if you can configure bridge between 2 SSMs within the same chassis&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Luis_Sanchez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-26T23:04:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SSM BRIDGE IN CHASSIS 41K</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/48768#M1852</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I need know if you can configure bridge between 2 SSMs within the same chassis&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/48768#M1852</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luis_Sanchez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-26T23:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SSM BRIDGE IN CHASSIS 41K</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/49264#M1853</link>
      <description>Not sure why you would need to do this.&lt;BR /&gt;Can you explain what you are trying to accomplish in more detail and why?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 00:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/49264#M1853</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-30T00:46:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SSM BRIDGE IN CHASSIS 41K</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/58663#M1854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is possible to have a bridge, or VS in bridge mode where it's two interfaces are traversing through port in SSM1 and SSM2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 16:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/58663#M1854</guid>
      <dc:creator>kobil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-21T16:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SSM BRIDGE IN CHASSIS 41K</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/58665#M1855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27531"&gt;@kobil&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's an interesting question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it better to use the same SSM with two ports or two different SSMˋs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there performance differences here?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Heiko&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 18:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/58665#M1855</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-21T18:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SSM BRIDGE IN CHASSIS 41K</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/58667#M1856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No gain or loss by using 2 interfaces where 1 on each SSM or 2 on the same one, however a good use case is to have a cross SSM bond (bond where each slave resides in different SSM) and configure the bridge with VLANs on each side, this way if 1 SSM fails the other one will act as backup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Its also possible to have 2 cross SSM bonds (one on each side) and accomplish this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 18:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/SSM-BRIDGE-IN-CHASSIS-41K/m-p/58667#M1856</guid>
      <dc:creator>kobil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-21T18:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

