<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dynamic NAT port allocation on SP systems? in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62594#M1747</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is an SP system, so i would immediately involve TAC here !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-12T12:25:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic NAT port allocation on SP systems?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62565#M1746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anybody use Dynamic NAT port allocation on SP systems ? ( R76SP50 JHFA Take 180 )&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using this since Jan 2017 and it is apparently no longer supported!! It is still enabled because nobody told us it was not supported and we have been experiencing all sorts of problems on the chassis.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check Point silently removed support ? Does anybody know anything about it?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SK103656&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the additional notes it says:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The feature is not supported on R76SP versions and on R80.20SP.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62565#M1746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Declan__McGill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T09:10:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic NAT port allocation on SP systems?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62594#M1747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is an SP system, so i would immediately involve TAC here !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62594#M1747</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T12:25:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic NAT port allocation on SP systems?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62600#M1748</link>
      <description>First thing I did! Yesterday! Have yet to get a response to the question as to whether and why it is suddenly unsupported.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Dynamic-NAT-port-allocation-on-SP-systems/m-p/62600#M1748</guid>
      <dc:creator>Declan__McGill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T13:12:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

