<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hanging client ports in chassis in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55825#M1720</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a weekend riddle for those running scalable platforms (we're on R76 SP50 T62 with 4 SGMs) &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; I need a break now as it took forever to get to the truth. Will be raising case after weekend!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In nutshell, we are seeing some connections from a client to domain controller not answered (4 TCP SYNs sent and no response) so we quickly blamed MS/WinOS. But it turned out that chassis was sitting in some strange state regarding some client ports - one SGM thought that connection is idle and correction SGM still had connection in the table.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After gigabytes of packet capture we got it - this scenario was created when TCP connection is released from both client and server nearly simultaneously. So somehow connection table update fails on SGMs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As always one diagram speaks 1000 words..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="OAS - FW connectivity issues.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1560i458A7FCEA97CB277/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="OAS - FW connectivity issues.jpg" alt="OAS - FW connectivity issues.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks as always!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know it's true because after manually deleting connection from blade 1_03 table, all works again on that port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-14T13:22:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hanging client ports in chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55825#M1720</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a weekend riddle for those running scalable platforms (we're on R76 SP50 T62 with 4 SGMs) &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; I need a break now as it took forever to get to the truth. Will be raising case after weekend!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In nutshell, we are seeing some connections from a client to domain controller not answered (4 TCP SYNs sent and no response) so we quickly blamed MS/WinOS. But it turned out that chassis was sitting in some strange state regarding some client ports - one SGM thought that connection is idle and correction SGM still had connection in the table.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After gigabytes of packet capture we got it - this scenario was created when TCP connection is released from both client and server nearly simultaneously. So somehow connection table update fails on SGMs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As always one diagram speaks 1000 words..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="OAS - FW connectivity issues.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1560i458A7FCEA97CB277/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="OAS - FW connectivity issues.jpg" alt="OAS - FW connectivity issues.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks as always!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know it's true because after manually deleting connection from blade 1_03 table, all works again on that port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55825#M1720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T13:22:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hanging client ports in chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55846#M1721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yup, that same solution i used. once&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;the connection is established again the issue fixed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 22:10:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55846#M1721</guid>
      <dc:creator>Murad_Elmgbar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-14T22:10:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hanging client ports in chassis</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55939#M1722</link>
      <description>Doesn't really work for us as it's a domain controller with millions of connections so I cannot sit there monitoring for hanging ports. Been trying to tweak the correction flows now to get the flow in a single blade but that won't fix actual underlying bug &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Hanging-client-ports-in-chassis/m-p/55939#M1722</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T10:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

