<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maestro dual site basic topology in Hyperscale Firewall (Maestro)</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162677#M1261</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you both for the advice and references. I will follow-up with the requester and local SE. Actually the PDF was misleading, the cabling is indeed meant to be full-mesh but there it looks like it's running through the local MHO to reach the second site which isn't the case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-21T17:49:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162585#M1252</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been tasked with a Maestro analysis based on the attached and would like to confirm my assumptions are correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The MHO are in different DC and will communicate through SFP for long distance between them&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The 4 6200 are full meshed with the 2 MHO to form a security group, locally DAC and remotely SFP long distance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The 2 MHO have a full mesh with the internal and external L3 switches to form LACP bonds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Since everything is full mesh to the MHO, the 4 6200 can form a single security group with all capacity used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Internal Router and External router have a lot of VLAN and each will do BGP with the MHO systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any remarks are welcome and regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 20:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162585#M1252</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-20T20:53:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162592#M1253</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Note the MHO doesn't host the BGP sessions, the SGM with the SMO role does - likely you will need to configure graceful restart.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Per sk168814 section "7. Maestro supported and recommended deployment examples" sounds like you are describing the "Multi Room" topology? e.g.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Multi Room202011060952452.png" style="width: 673px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18478iCC892DA80F9EAB62/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Multi Room202011060952452.png" alt="Multi Room202011060952452.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer also:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk92755&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Quantum" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk92755: Compatibility of transceivers for Check Point appliances&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:34:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162592#M1253</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-21T00:34:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162593#M1254</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your cabling doesn't seem to be correct. Please refer to &lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Appliances/GSG_Maestro/EN/Topics/Connecting-Cables-Dual-Site.htm" target="_self"&gt;this guide&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and my &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/fyrhh23835/attachments/fyrhh23835/member-exclusives/598/1/CPX%202022%20-%20Maestro%20-%20CheckMates%20Track.pdf" target="_self"&gt;CPX presentation&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also a &lt;STRONG&gt;dual-site active/active &lt;/STRONG&gt;full-mesh topology is currently&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;not&lt;/U&gt; supported&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;See &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk168814" target="_self"&gt;sk168814&lt;/A&gt; and&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/Introduction-to-Maestro-EMEA-session/m-p/156237#M1138" target="_self"&gt;Maestro Intro &amp;amp; Best Practices 2022&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In order to form a full mesh active/active solution you'll need to switch to a single site (&lt;EM&gt;dual/multi room&lt;/EM&gt;) topology.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162593#M1254</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-21T00:30:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162677#M1261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you both for the advice and references. I will follow-up with the requester and local SE. Actually the PDF was misleading, the cabling is indeed meant to be full-mesh but there it looks like it's running through the local MHO to reach the second site which isn't the case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/162677#M1261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-21T17:49:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/259483#M3675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Danny,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is this dual-site active/active&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;full-mesh topology&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;supported now ?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 19:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/259483#M3675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gil_Lim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-08T19:07:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/259501#M3676</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most recent update I saw on it in the community was here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/Check-Point-integration-with-Cisco-ACI-Multi-Pod-Maestro-and/m-p/259453#M3674" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Maestro/Check-Point-integration-with-Cisco-ACI-Multi-Pod-Maestro-and/m-p/259453#M3674&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 23:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/259501#M3676</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-08T23:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maestro dual site basic topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/259596#M3683</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9191"&gt;@Gil_Lim&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: It's not supported yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 07:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Hyperscale-Firewall-Maestro/Maestro-dual-site-basic-topology/m-p/259596#M3683</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-10T07:06:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

