<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VRRP Failover in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49484#M9692</link>
    <description>If you've configured it correctly, that's precisely what should happen.&lt;BR /&gt;Can you provide a screenshot of your config?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 18:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-01T18:44:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VRRP Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49384#M9668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In VRRP configuration, is it possible to have all interfaces on the primary fail-over to the secondary if any of the interfaces on the primary goes down?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example: I have bond1 and bond6 as master on my primary FW. On the secondary, they are Backup. I want if I shutdown bond1 on the switch, both bond1 and bond6 should become master on the secondary firewall instead of bond1 becoming master and bond6 still showing as backup on the secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it make sense?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2019 20:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49384#M9668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gabriel_Support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-31T20:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49484#M9692</link>
      <description>If you've configured it correctly, that's precisely what should happen.&lt;BR /&gt;Can you provide a screenshot of your config?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 18:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49484#M9692</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T18:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VRRP Failover</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49493#M9699</link>
      <description>Can you share the output of "show mcvr vrids"&lt;BR /&gt;It sounds like you have configured multiple VRID's 1 per bond interface.&lt;BR /&gt;You should configure all interfaces in the same VRID with a priority delta of 10 and a difference of 5 (in most cases this should suffice).&lt;BR /&gt;We tend to use 200 and 205 for the priorities, where the gateway with 205 is the master.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 21:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VRRP-Failover/m-p/49493#M9699</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-01T21:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

