<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32387#M6791</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Di Junior,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;create a PRoxy ARP rule on the external interface for the stream.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:36:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Roman_Niewiado1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-01T09:36:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32384#M6788</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Hi Mates&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;I am trying to establish a connection with one of my client’s partner over SIGTRAN and SIP.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;In order to enhance the security of my client, we wish to use private IPs in the internal network, and have their Check Point doing NAT for the SIGTRAN and SIP traffic. Unfortunately, this scenario is not working. But if I use Public IPs everything works as normal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;My two questions are:&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;1. Is it possible to perform NAT on SIGTRAN/SIP running UDP protocol at the application layer?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;" /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;2. If yes, is this functionality included in every Check Point appliance, or specific series?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32384#M6788</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-24T12:09:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32385#M6789</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide more information about your topology, rules and NAT settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the interim, please check&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;sk110370 and you can use&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk95369 for overall VOIP on&amp;nbsp; Check Point references.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32385#M6789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-24T14:19:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32386#M6790</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there, thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My client is truying to migrate call control traffic from ISUP to SIP and voice traffic to RTP.&lt;BR /&gt;The client is using Private addresses in its internal network, and this is what is happening:&lt;BR /&gt;1. The SIP trunk became up, but with some problems:&lt;BR /&gt; - Calls from the Client could be established, but the calls were mute (No RTP packet were sent from each direction)&lt;BR /&gt; - My client could not set up call to its partner, 503 status code (Service unavailable) was being received&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once I changed the client SBC to public address removing the need for NAT, everything worked just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any additional thoughts to what might be causing this problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 06:59:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32386#M6790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-01T06:59:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32387#M6791</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Di Junior,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;create a PRoxy ARP rule on the external interface for the stream.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:36:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32387#M6791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roman_Niewiado1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-01T09:36:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32388#M6792</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Roman,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any documentation that you would like to refer me to..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32388#M6792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Di_Junior</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-01T09:50:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32389#M6793</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Di Junior,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;normally you should not need to create a Proxy ARP rule, because you are initiating the connection. But in my case it helped to get the stream.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk30197&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL," title="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk30197&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL,"&gt;Configuring Proxy ARP for Manual NAT&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 10:09:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/32389#M6793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roman_Niewiado1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-01T10:09:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT on SIP traffic application layer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/195570#M32799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you ever resolve this? I’m having a similar issue at the moment that’s with TAC.&lt;BR /&gt;I posted this article on CheckMates from my other account:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Inbound-Calls-No-Audio-Outbound-Calls-OK-Displacing-SonicWALL/m-p/195248#M32731" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Inbound-Calls-No-Audio-Outbound-Calls-OK-Displacing-SonicWALL/m-p/195248#M32731&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proxy ARP is all in place so this isn’t it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 23:25:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/NAT-on-SIP-traffic-application-layer/m-p/195570#M32799</guid>
      <dc:creator>SCSupport</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-18T23:25:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

