<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISP Redundancy (R80.10) - ISP monitored hosts question in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28601#M5834</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think there is a way to change this logic. It's best practice to select only hosts on stable links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-21T11:00:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP Redundancy (R80.10) - ISP monitored hosts question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28600#M5833</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about Advanced settings in ISP link configuration. It reads in the description "If &lt;STRONG&gt;any of the hosts&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the list fail to respond, the Link is considered to be down" (see the picture). Is there any way to change this logic from "any of the hosts" to "&lt;STRONG&gt;all of the hosts&lt;/STRONG&gt;"? In my opinion, "any of the hosts" logic might lead to significant amount of false positives on unstable links which might lead to frequent default route changes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/70792_pastedImage_3.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28600#M5833</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vlad_Voronko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-21T09:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Redundancy (R80.10) - ISP monitored hosts question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28601#M5834</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think there is a way to change this logic. It's best practice to select only hosts on stable links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28601#M5834</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-21T11:00:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Redundancy (R80.10) - ISP monitored hosts question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28602#M5835</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, Danny. Well, I hope Checkpoint will add this feature in future releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone happen to know how many ping requests a security gateway sends towards the defined host? It can't be it just sends one ICMP request, right? &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28602#M5835</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vlad_Voronko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-21T11:17:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Redundancy (R80.10) - ISP monitored hosts question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28603#M5836</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually it is possible to do this, it is a "hidden" setting described here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk102848&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=Security" style="max-width: 840px;"&gt;sk102848: How to configure &lt;STRONG&gt;ISP&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Redundancy&lt;/STRONG&gt; Link to fail over only when all configured hosts are not answering to pings&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt; Second Edition of my "Max Power" Firewall Book&lt;BR /&gt; Now Available at &lt;A href="http://www.maxpowerfirewalls.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.maxpowerfirewalls.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28603#M5836</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-21T12:42:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP Redundancy (R80.10) - ISP monitored hosts question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28604#M5837</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, Timothy. That's exactly what I've been looking for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it works for R80.10 too &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ISP-Redundancy-R80-10-ISP-monitored-hosts-question/m-p/28604#M5837</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vlad_Voronko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-21T13:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

