<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Voice over WiFi (VoWIFI) using UDP/IKE to specific destinations in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28111#M5698</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First, this might be better in &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/community/infinity-general?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=614a3d78-07ff-4903-8b57-bcf08c7843e1&amp;amp;searchIndex=0" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/community/infinity-general?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=614a3d78-07ff-4903-8b57-bcf08c7843e1&amp;amp;searchIndex=0&lt;/A&gt;‌.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second, if you happen to know what SIP endpoint they are connecting to by DNS name, perhaps you can use a Dynamic and/or a Domain Object to allow SIP traffic to only those specific hostnames (depending on your gateway release).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll check with R&amp;amp;D and see if there are better options than this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-21T09:15:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Voice over WiFi (VoWIFI) using UDP/IKE to specific destinations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28110#M5697</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First Post here so forgive any misteps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a challenge that is going around in circles the last week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Australia we the Telco's are now doing VoWIFI which is basically an IKE Tunnel to their servers to allow VoWIFI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are more than happy to allow this traffic on our Guest Wireless networks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, Anon/PrivateVPN services also use UDP/500 to do their business which we block by policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can create a specific rule and match those destinations which will work for a while, however the providers will change their server addresses so I will play 'Chase The Server' in the next 12 months.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question, is it worth trying to get this recognized as a new Application? Do the packet capture and see if there is any SIP identifiers inside etc?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best way to go about this - hoping it might result in a benefit to others not just us?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 06:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28110#M5697</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin_Dean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-07T06:26:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Voice over WiFi (VoWIFI) using UDP/IKE to specific destinations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28111#M5698</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First, this might be better in &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/community/infinity-general?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=614a3d78-07ff-4903-8b57-bcf08c7843e1&amp;amp;searchIndex=0" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/community/infinity-general?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=614a3d78-07ff-4903-8b57-bcf08c7843e1&amp;amp;searchIndex=0&lt;/A&gt;‌.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second, if you happen to know what SIP endpoint they are connecting to by DNS name, perhaps you can use a Dynamic and/or a Domain Object to allow SIP traffic to only those specific hostnames (depending on your gateway release).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll check with R&amp;amp;D and see if there are better options than this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28111#M5698</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T09:15:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Voice over WiFi (VoWIFI) using UDP/IKE to specific destinations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28112#M5699</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dameon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The DNS name is a long server specific name which would probably change as well, not sure how the device seeks the other tunnel endpoint.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The FW (80.10 release) detects the traffic as UDP/IKE, not SIP - only after you inspect the traffic do you see any SIP headers. It is a tricky issue...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28112#M5699</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin_Dean</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-12T00:37:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Voice over WiFi (VoWIFI) using UDP/IKE to specific destinations</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28113#M5700</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We might be able to better identify the traffic with some packet captures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We probably need 2-3 captures per client and a few different clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will help us fingerprint this traffic better and hopefully be able to distinguish between it and other IKE traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please open a TAC case:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://www.checkpoint.com/support-services/contact-support/index.html" title="http://www.checkpoint.com/support-services/contact-support/index.html"&gt;Contact Support | Check Point Software&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Voice-over-WiFi-VoWIFI-using-UDP-IKE-to-specific-destinations/m-p/28113#M5700</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-12T02:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

