<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cluster members with different interface names in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24950#M4987</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R77.30 cluster running on open servers with 1GB NICs.&amp;nbsp; I'm planning to upgrade cluster nodes with 10GB cards. Can I, for the duration of the upgrade, have one node equipped with 10GB cards assuming that the IP addressing is consistent?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume that the interface names will not match, so when I reset the SIC and get the topology from the new node, could it cause issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:21:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Teddy_Brewski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-16T19:21:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster members with different interface names</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24950#M4987</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R77.30 cluster running on open servers with 1GB NICs.&amp;nbsp; I'm planning to upgrade cluster nodes with 10GB cards. Can I, for the duration of the upgrade, have one node equipped with 10GB cards assuming that the IP addressing is consistent?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume that the interface names will not match, so when I reset the SIC and get the topology from the new node, could it cause issues?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:21:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24950#M4987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teddy_Brewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T19:21:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster members with different interface names</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24951#M4988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Dashboard, you can set the interface names of each member, for the same IP network, the ethx.y does not need to be the same on both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your asking is it wise to do, that is a different discussion. But yes it can be done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24951#M4988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T21:49:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster members with different interface names</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24952#M4989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/50921"&gt;Maarten Sjouw&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;. In my case it's going to be a temporary change, since at the end the second node will follow the same naming. And if I ask whether it's wise &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt; -- is it a matter of additional thing to consider during troubleshooting, or there is something else involved?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24952#M4989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teddy_Brewski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-16T22:51:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster members with different interface names</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24953#M4990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is mostly a matter of not supported, difficulties in troubleshooting and anything else you can think of that could go wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Cluster-members-with-different-interface-names/m-p/24953#M4990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-17T09:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

