<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R82.10 invalid query syntax using subnets in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279309#M46534</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;R81.20&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 21:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christopher_Ham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-06T21:04:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R82.10 invalid query syntax using subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279247#M46530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a single standalone instance of a firewall deployment where I'm having a problem querying IP subnets using asterisks or CIDR, no matter the combination. I'm just now observing this behaviour after upgrading to R82.10, no matter the JHF iterations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No issues with the query using single host IPs such as /32, as they appear in the logs. Anything with a larger network prefix (/8,/30,/24 etc..) creates this error. Any assistance is appreciated to repair this problem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Log Query syntax:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;blade:Firewall OR blade:IPS AND NOT dst:20.*&lt;BR /&gt;blade:Firewall OR blade:IPS AND NOT dst:10.0.0.0/8&lt;BR /&gt;NOT dst:20.0.0.0/8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fw ver: This is Check Point's software version R82.10 - Build 010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cpinfo [FW1]&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_NGM_DOCTOR_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R82_10_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 24&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_R82_10_GA_TIME_FIX_MAIN Take: 2&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_GOT_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_VCE_R82_10_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_PUBLIC_CLOUD_CA_BUNDLE_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_INEXT_NANO_EGG_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_WEBCONSOLE_AUTOUPDATE&lt;BR /&gt;HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 10:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279247#M46530</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher_Ham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-05T10:16:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 invalid query syntax using subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279308#M46533</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What version did this work with previously?&lt;BR /&gt;This likely needs a TAC case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 21:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279308#M46533</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-06T21:00:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 invalid query syntax using subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279309#M46534</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;R81.20&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 21:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-invalid-query-syntax-using-subnets/m-p/279309#M46534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher_Ham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-06T21:04:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

