<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277781#M46277</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What was your upgrade path here? Was it raw R82.10 build 271 that you then upgraded with the specific 3900 blink package?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 03:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-03T03:18:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277611#M46255</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So this is new...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;gateway01&amp;gt; set snapshot-onetime revert target lvm name Blink_R82.10_402
NMSNAP0042  Bad snapshot name. Snapshot name may only contain up to 15 digits, letters and underscores (_)
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3950 appliance, R82.10, take 271&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Had an in-place Blink upgrade to take 467 fail, but now I can't revert back to try it again. &amp;nbsp;This worked on 2 other 3900s (one 3950 and one 3980). &amp;nbsp;TAC case is open for the upgrade failure issue, tho.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 02:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277611#M46255</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T02:08:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277613#M46256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting, never seen that before. Hope they can sort it out...but, is that actual snapshot name?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 02:49:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277613#M46256</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T02:49:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277614#M46257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yep!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;gateway01&amp;gt; show snapshots
Restore points:
---------------
Blink_R82.10_402
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 02:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277614#M46257</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T02:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277615#M46258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It doesn't like the full stop/decimal point in the name, I'd guess. Though really it shouldn't have let you take it in the first place if that's the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277615#M46258</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T05:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277627#M46259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was the snapshot created by the Blink upgrade, automatically. &amp;nbsp;The manual command indeed refuses to make one with that name pattern.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On an R82.10 Take 467 gateway:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;gateway02&amp;gt; add snapshot-onetime name Foo_R82.10 description FooSnap 
NMSNAP9999  Snapshot name may only contain digits, letters and underscores. Maximum 255 characters
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looks like the Left Thumb didn't talk to the Left Pinky about this. &amp;nbsp;Oops. &amp;nbsp;TAC case again?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:03:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277627#M46259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T13:03:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277631#M46261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Maybe try reverting in GRUB? It may have fewer restrictions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That said, I've had major snapshot problems on two separate systems, now. I've taken a snapshot on R82, upgraded the system to R82.10, reverted to the snapshot, and wound up with a totally hosed system. Both would hang at different points during boot. Went into single-user, and lv_current was 100% used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:31:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277631#M46261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T14:31:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277633#M46262</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Another bonus, that I didn't check first, is that the snapshot name from a Blink upgrade is 16 characters. &amp;nbsp;Oops x2. &amp;nbsp;The TAC person said no one over there knows how to recover from such a situation as an "interrupted" upgrade like this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Deployment Agent as a whole is angry because /mnt/fcd is still present, and has a path opt/ which contains the various Deployment Agent logs. &amp;nbsp;These were copied over by the installer from /opt/CPInstLog, according to the last line of the log:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[2026-05-28 - 20:15:24][294723 295414]:Copying CPInstLog dir
[2026-05-28 - 20:15:24][294723 295414]:about to copy dir /opt/CPInstLog/ to /mnt/fcd//opt
[2026-05-28 - 20:15:24][294723 295414]:About to execute command: /bin/cp -af /opt/CPInstLog/ /mnt/fcd//opt
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The appliance rebooted, but since the process died, it can't recover.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm going to schedule a plain reboot tonight with the customer; perhaps it'll pick up where it left off and try Stage 2 again...? maybe?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 16:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277633#M46262</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T16:23:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277634#M46263</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hope all goes well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 17:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277634#M46263</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-29T17:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277777#M46275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That sounds very much like TAC needs to be escalating that information to the Blink owners internally.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 02:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277777#M46275</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-03T02:29:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277780#M46276</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yep, they're waiting on me for some follow-up info which I was able to collect today. &amp;nbsp;Short version:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;1. The gateway actually &amp;nbsp;never even rebooted, but I thought it did! &amp;nbsp;It looked like it did, tho. &amp;nbsp;When we pulled the power cable to hard cycle, it booted up and continued onwards to finish the upgrade as expected. &amp;nbsp;Everything seems relatively fine after that now.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;2. Reboot and shutdown scripts on R82.10 appear to be nothing but a NO-OP. &amp;nbsp;The scripts shutdown FWD, shutdown the interfaces, then....exit. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure how reboot signals are expected to be handled, but I don't see anywhere this is happening. &amp;nbsp;We couldn't reboot it from the 'reboot' or 'shutdown -r now' commands. &amp;nbsp;Something is amiss here. &amp;nbsp;This is why we had to do the hard power cycle above.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;3. "This is not the systemctl you're looking for". &amp;nbsp;/bin/systemctl is just a wrapper Bash script that calls the SysV init scripts. &amp;nbsp;Um.. what? &amp;nbsp;Systemd appears to be running things from the places we expect, which is how it picked up the post-boot script.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;I also had a Jumbo HFA install fail tonight on a second gateway. &amp;nbsp;It was already Take 467 with Jumbo HFA 6; I did the initial re-install/upgrade before putting the gateway into service. &amp;nbsp;This one clearly rebooted successfully at the time. &amp;nbsp;Tonight, I was installing Jumbo HFA 19 (for a VPN degradation issue they're having, that seems to be addressed in JHF 19).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;It seems to have cranked the CPU and some system processes, then ... died. &amp;nbsp;It was at the 85% level of "copying files..." when it just died. &amp;nbsp;No console output when the customer connected... dunno if it even rebooted. &amp;nbsp;The grub2 password we set also didn't work, so no snapshot revert option, no maintenance mode, nothing. &amp;nbsp;Had no choice but to do factory reset.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;In short...this has been a very painful experience with the 3900s. &amp;nbsp;Nothing positive to say about these yet.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;EDIT: &amp;nbsp;I'm leaving the above, as a public confession of my sins and guilt. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp;I found the issue here and it's... sigh... embarrassingly awful. The &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;systemctl&lt;/FONT&gt; script issue wasn't with the JHF or the Blink image after all. &amp;nbsp;I'm gonna update the TAC SR as well. We had a deployment playbook that mis-categorized the 3900s and applied the wrong package to them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm gonna update the other messages here as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27871"&gt;@Bob_Zimmerman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; for your verification info as well! That was helpful to see!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277780#M46276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-11T14:26:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277781#M46277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What was your upgrade path here? Was it raw R82.10 build 271 that you then upgraded with the specific 3900 blink package?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 03:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277781#M46277</guid>
      <dc:creator>emmap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-03T03:18:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277810#M46284</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Out-of-box, it was the factory original Take 271 (GA1). I then installed the Quantum Force 3900 Take 22 hotfix; (GA2 wasn't available then). &amp;nbsp;Then I did Blink in-place upgrade to Take 467 (GA2) when it came available with Jumbo HFA Take 6 (new LVM volume anyway, with LV snapshot of 271). &amp;nbsp;That process went just fine originally, just as expected, and the gateway was operating for a few weeks successfully. &amp;nbsp;Very unremarkable, as it should be.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, I went to install the Jumbo HFA 19 package like any other Jumbo HFA would. &amp;nbsp;I always run verifier before doing anything, too, and verifier succeeded with "install.applicable: true" and no warnings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It went through the routine, then got to the meaningless 85% with message "Copying files". &amp;nbsp;Sat there for a long time, which is fine... I always see it sit here with no updates. &amp;nbsp;I played a card game of "Go Fish" with my daughter over dinner to pass the time. &amp;nbsp;Eventually, the system became unresponsive... then my SSH session was killed and that was the end. &amp;nbsp;No remote access, so customer traveled to the office. &amp;nbsp;After about an hour, customer connected console cable but got no output. We let it sit for several more minutes but still nothing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Had no meaningful option but to power cycle it. &amp;nbsp;I hated to do it, but I knew we could revert to some prior snapshot. &amp;nbsp;Then that turned out to be a bad choice. &amp;nbsp;None of our input choices worked, even tho the CLISH config showed "set grub2-password-hash&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;grub.pbkdf2.sha512.10000.&amp;lt;string&amp;gt;". &amp;nbsp;I know what I set that to when I did that on the original Gaia FTW of the appliance initial install. &amp;nbsp;I copied it from another CLISH config where I set it manually at the CLI, and typed in the password string.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'll update my write-up for TAC with this info, too.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;EDIT: This message is still relevant, because we still had the Grub boot menu issue despite the above&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;systemctl&lt;/FONT&gt; script issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277810#M46284</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-11T14:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277821#M46285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm also gonna ask the customer to hang back one day at the office to see if we can do our own reboot tests and sanity-check the grub password mess. &amp;nbsp;Too bad I don't have one of these on hand to test myself. &amp;nbsp;With all these things, I'd bang on it and beat it to death with tests. &amp;nbsp;I would've imagined R&amp;amp;D had done similar, but maybe they were pressured to get them shipped out the door... "we'll fix it in post! HFA-4-evah!".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 21:14:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277821#M46285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-03T21:14:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277879#M46299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;EDIT: the below script info is not relevant now, but I'm leaving it here because the diagnostic path itself is still useful; even if the end result was bogus.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;Did the confirmation test last night. &amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;reboot&lt;/FONT&gt; and &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;shutdown&lt;/FONT&gt; are broken on R82.10.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@gateway01:0]# which reboot
alias reboot='/bin/system_reboot'
/bin/system_reboot

[Expert@gateway01:0]# ls -l /bin/system_reboot 
-rwxr-xr-x 1 admin root 3996 May  4 08:39 /bin/system_reboot

[Expert@gateway01:0]# file /bin/system_reboot 
/bin/system_reboot: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;So "reboot" is just a link &amp;nbsp;to a shell script. &amp;nbsp;Interesting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;(omitting the ceremonial parts)&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@gateway01:0]# cat /bin/system_reboot 
#!/bin/sh
#
# reboot wrapper

#
# ...skip...
#

function kill_fwd_gracefully {
# skip ...
#
cpwd_admin stop -name FWD -path "$FWDIR/bin/fw" -command "fw kill fwd" &amp;amp; &amp;gt; /dev/null 

}

function down_and_reboot {

cluster_down
sleep 3
if $isVSX; then
ensure_context_is_VS0
fi
logger "Set interfaces down before reboot"

for x in $(get_phys_ifs) ; do
$IP link set dev $x down  ## INTERFACES GO DOWN; NO REMOTE ACCESS
done

if $isVSX; then
down_vs_interfaces
fi

kill_fwd_gracefully
/sbin/reboot  ### &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; HERE

}

###
# skip
###

## prompt Are you sure?(y/n)
askreally || {
  echo "Reboot aborted." 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1
  exit 1
}

down_and_reboot  # call above function

exit 0   ##&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; HERE 2
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;The "HERE" comments show where the sequence goes wrong. &amp;nbsp;So the script calls another script, which is a link to... what?! a fake &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;systemctl&lt;/FONT&gt; script in Bash!?&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@gateway01:0]# file /sbin/reboot 
/sbin/reboot: symbolic link to ../bin/systemctl

[Expert@gateway01:0]# file /bin/systemctl 
/bin/systemctl: Bourne-Again shell script, ASCII text executable


[Expert@gateway01:0]# cat /bin/systemctl 
#!/bin/bash
#

service_name=${BASH_ARGV[0]}            ## Processes arguments in reverse order
service_name=${service_name%%.service}  ## creates a SysV-style system service

for opt in ${BASH_ARGV[@]}
do
  case $opt in
    enable)
      systemd_script=$(grep ExecStart= /usr/lib/systemd/system/${service_name}.service|cut -f 2 -d '='|cut -f 1 -d ' ')
      init_script=${systemd_script%%.sh}
      init_script=${init_script/*\//}
      cp $systemd_script /etc/rc.d/init.d/${init_script}

      chkconfig --add ${service_name}
      chkconfig ${service_name} on
    ;;

    disable)
      systemd_script=$(grep ExecStart= /usr/lib/systemd/system/${service_name}.service|cut -f 2 -d '='|cut -f 1 -d ' ')
      init_script=${systemd_script%%.sh}
      init_script=${init_script/*\//}
      chkconfig ${service_name} off
      chkconfig --del ${service_name}

      rm /etc/rc.d/init.d/${init_script}
    ;;

    start)
      service ${service_name} start
    ;;

    stop)
      service ${service_name} stop
    ;;

    *)   ### DEFAULT HANDLER for no arguments
    ;;   ### Does nothing
  esac
done

### END OF SCRIPT ...Nothing happens here?
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;Uh... this script does nothing. &amp;nbsp;It does a head-fake for a "systemctl" command that just twists itself back to a SysV init script. &amp;nbsp;For "reboot", it reaches the default handler, does nothing, then the end of the script exits, &amp;nbsp;returns back to the caller script, which also does an "exit 0", but only after it happily shuts down the interfaces, locking you out remotely! &amp;nbsp;Now you call the customer, or make the drive yourself, to either pull the power or connect a console cable!&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[EDIT: The below is still correct; the Gaia Deployment Agent does use its own reboot handler; I did discover that.]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can login at console and give PID 1 the "kill -SIGINT 1" command and that forces a reboot. &amp;nbsp;PID 1 is now &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;systemd&lt;/FONT&gt;, not &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;init&lt;/FONT&gt;, and SIGINT (signal 2) causes &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;systemd&lt;/FONT&gt; to run its own default reboot handler, which does work successfully. &amp;nbsp;Meanwhile, all of the expected systemctl commands are fake and just &lt;FONT face="andale mono,times"&gt;exit 0&lt;/FONT&gt;. &amp;nbsp;I sent this to my TAC case last night.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;This scenario exists on both GA1 and GA2. &amp;nbsp;Can someone escalate this to R&amp;amp;D?&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As for the Deployment Agent, this must use its own reboot handler after packages are installed; &lt;STRIKE&gt;that has to be the only way I was able to install GA2 on 2 of these gateways.&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277879#M46299</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-11T14:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277883#M46301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just checked a 3920 and /bin/systemctl is an ELF for aarch64:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@SomeFirewall:0]# clish -c "show asset system" | egrep "^[PM]"
Platform: BT-91-00
Model: CheckPoint 3920

[Expert@SomeFirewall:0]# file /sbin/{halt,init,poweroff,reboot,shutdown}
/sbin/halt:     symbolic link to ../bin/systemctl
/sbin/init:     symbolic link to ../lib/systemd/systemd
/sbin/poweroff: symbolic link to ../bin/systemctl
/sbin/reboot:   symbolic link to ../bin/systemctl
/sbin/shutdown: symbolic link to ../bin/systemctl

[Expert@SomeFirewall:0]# file /bin/systemctl 
/bin/systemctl: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1, for GNU/Linux 3.7.0, BuildID[sha1]=7d40af13734da760dc7294191cb8e75d21f6159f, stripped

[Expert@SomeFirewall:0]# file /lib/systemd/systemd
/lib/systemd/systemd: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1, for GNU/Linux 3.7.0, BuildID[sha1]=a60ba79171277846207d64cbed8378406ca6e955, stripped&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Same on a 3200 running R82.10 (though obviously x86-64 instead of aarch64). Not doubting what you see, but providing a data point that what you see doesn't seem to always be the case. Not sure what the difference might be between our environments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;'init 6' should give you a clean reboot from systemd directly without needing systemctl. Tested on the 3200.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You should always be able to force a reboot with 'echo b &amp;gt;/proc/sysrq-trigger'. This doesn't stop services or sync filesystems, so could result in data loss (same as pulling the power cord).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277883#M46301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-05T15:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277884#M46302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;These gateways are 3950 and 3980, but still aarch64:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@gateway01:0]# clish -c "show asset system"
Platform: BT-92-00
Model: CheckPoint 3950
Serial Number: WA25804857
CPU Model: Arm..Neoverse..(N2)
CPU Frequency: 2100 MHz
Number of Cores: 8
CPU Hyperthreading: Disabled

[Expert@gateway02:0]# clish -c "show asset system"
Platform: BT-93-00
Model: CheckPoint 3980
Serial Number: WA25400346
CPU Model: Arm..Neoverse..(N2)
CPU Frequency: 2700 MHz
Number of Cores: 8
CPU Hyperthreading: Disabled
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's wild that your systemctl is an ELF binary!! I don't have a 3920 to compare, tho. &amp;nbsp;How in the world did my 3 gateways turn out differently?!? Very wild!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"init 6" doesn't work because PID 1 is now "systemd" not "init" anymore. &amp;nbsp;I definitely tried that, tho. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRIKE&gt;R82.00 has "'/sbin/reboot" linked to an ELF binary for "/sbin/halt":&lt;/STRIKE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@mgmt01:0]# fw ver
This is Check Point's software version R82 - Build 019
[Expert@mgmt01:0]# file /sbin/reboot 
/sbin/reboot: symbolic link to `halt'
[Expert@mgmt01:0]# file /sbin/halt 
/sbin/halt: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped
[Expert@mgmt01:0]# 
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Edit: Yes I did send updated CPINFO to the TAC SR, and the person said they'd file a request with R&amp;amp;D. &amp;nbsp;This is going to be an "interesting" case...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277884#M46302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-11T14:32:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277887#M46303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;'init 6' definitely works on the R82.10 systems I've tried (two now, including a 3920). It doesn't give any feedback in the terminal where you run it, the system just reboots after 30 seconds or so.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;systemd is a nondeterministic trainwreck, so it wouldn't exactly surprise me if it simply failed to reboot on the systems you tried. 'echo b &amp;gt;/proc/sysrq-trigger' only depends on the kernel, so if it's running well enough to let you type commands in a shell, it should work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277887#M46303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-05T16:36:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277888#M46304</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Odd. &amp;nbsp;What is your pid 1?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@gw01:0]# ps -p 1
    PID TTY          TIME CMD
      1 ?        00:00:00 systemd
[Expert@gw01:0]# 
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:43:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277888#M46304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-05T16:43:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277891#M46305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Connected via a serial server, it gives more output:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@DallasSC:0]# clish -c "show asset system" | egrep "^[PM]"
Platform: PB-10-00
Model: Check Point 3200

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# fwm ver
This is Check Point Security Management Server R82.10 - Build 003

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# cpinfo -y all 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1 | grep "JUMBO_HF_MAIN" | uniq
	HOTFIX_R82_10_JUMBO_HF_MAIN	Take:  19
	BUNDLE_R82_10_JUMBO_HF_MAIN	Take:  19

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# ps -p 1
    PID TTY          TIME CMD
      1 ?        00:00:03 systemd

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# which init
/sbin/init

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# file $(which init)
/sbin/init: symbolic link to ../lib/systemd/systemd

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# init 6

[Expert@DallasSC:0]# [ 6391.698495] bootsplashd[701]: looking up window text geometry
[ 6391.698619] bootsplashd[701]: window is now 80x25 text cells
[ 6391.878995] wrp.sh[173080]: Removing wrp module
[ 6392.032987] blkdeactivate[173063]: Deactivating block devices:
[ 6392.065274] blkdeactivate[173063]:   [SKIP]: unmount of vg_splat-lv_log (dm-1) mounted on /var/log
[ 6392.065641] blkdeactivate[173063]:   [SKIP]: unmount of vg_splat-lv_current (dm-0) mounted on /
[ 6392.352824] cpboot[173209]: cpwd_admin:
[ 6392.353036] cpboot[173209]: Process PROBEMOND isn't monitored by cpWatchDog. Stop request aborts
...&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277891#M46305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-05T17:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82.10 snapshot revert error</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277893#M46306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hah! &amp;nbsp;*THAT* we agree on:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@gw01:0]# which init
/sbin/init

[Expert@ gw01:0]# ls -l /sbin/init
lrwxrwxrwx 1 admin root 22 Jun  2 21:11 /sbin/init -&amp;gt; ../lib/systemd/systemd

[Expert@ gw01:0]# file /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1, for GNU/Linux 3.7.0, BuildID[sha1]=a60ba79171277846207d64cbed8378406ca6e955, stripped
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ok, so this *might* have worked on that one gateway where I tried it, but this was in a state where the Blink installer failed reboot following the stage 1 process, and I believe Deployment Agent (or something) was eating the reboot signal.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So my "that didn't work" statement needed a "*" on it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-10-snapshot-revert-error/m-p/277893#M46306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-05T17:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

