<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: S2S With Cato in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276478#M46129</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the best solution is to use route based vpn with dynamic routing protocol like BGP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>simonemantovani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-05T09:18:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>S2S With Cato</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276477#M46128</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Mates,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a question regarding the setup of a Site-to-Site VPN between a Check Point cluster and two Cato peers with redundancy.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the best way to configure this scenario to ensure proper redundancy and failover between the two peers? Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276477#M46128</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemoteUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-05T09:15:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S2S With Cato</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276478#M46129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the best solution is to use route based vpn with dynamic routing protocol like BGP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276478#M46129</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonemantovani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-05T09:18:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S2S With Cato</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276480#M46130</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Simone,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it also possible to achieve this using MEP, with the center gateways acting as the peer gateways? And in satellite gateways my checkpoint cluster?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:36:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276480#M46130</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemoteUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-05T09:36:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S2S With Cato</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276483#M46131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MEP is only available between Check Point gateways.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm pretty sure that Cato support VPN route-based with BGP (or eventually static routing); I found a documentation page from Cato official site related to VPN between AWS gateway with redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Usually if you need redundancy, the best solution (adopted also by cloud provider, Harmony SASE, etc.) is route based vpn with routing protocol.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276483#M46131</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonemantovani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-05T10:06:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S2S With Cato</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276489#M46132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi simone,&lt;BR /&gt;so i need to create VTI for this right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:54:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276489#M46132</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemoteUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-05T12:54:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: S2S With Cato</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276490#M46133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you should create 2 VTIs numbered&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/S2S-With-Cato/m-p/276490#M46133</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonemantovani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-05T12:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

