<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Special functions via policy - name field in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258343#M43603</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The question is whether there are more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I once managed layer 4 switches from a certain manufacturer via the policy name field under R7x as well. They were able to set local access lists and accelerate Layer 4 connections directly on the switch. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But for the life of me, I can’t remember the name or the SK anymore.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-26T20:49:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Special functions via policy - name field</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258116#M43547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the past, one of our customers, for example, used the prefix “fast_rule_” in the name field of a firewall policy. This caused the connection to be accelerated directly on the hyperscaler.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At the moment, I am looking for all such prefixes in policy names that trigger special functions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Are there any others?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Name_435345.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/31527i4F226C1F06BE827E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Name_435345.png" alt="Name_435345.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently, I know of the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE border="1" width="100%"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR style="background-color: cccccc; height: 24px;"&gt;
&lt;TD width="50%" height="24px" style="background-color: #cccccc;"&gt;Name&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="50%" height="24px" style="width: 50%; height: 24px; background-color: #cccccc;"&gt;Description of the function&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD width="50%" height="24px"&gt;fast_rule_&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="50%" height="24px"&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.20/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.20_Maestro_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-Maestro-AG/Fastforward.htm#Topologies" target="_self"&gt;Maestro Administration Guide - MHO Fast Forward&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD width="50%" height="24px"&gt;PBR_&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="50%" height="24px"&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167135" target="_self"&gt;Firewall rule matching in PBR - sk167135&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258116#M43547</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-24T12:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Special functions via policy - name field</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258147#M43553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wow Heiko, thats super interesting find...I did not even know something like could happen. Did you ever verify with TAC?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258147#M43553</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-25T00:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Special functions via policy - name field</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258161#M43560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The two functions mentioned above do exist.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ten years ago, with R7x, there was also an extension that forwarded L3/L4 traffic directly on the switch via API. Unfortunately, I’ve forgotten the abbreviation and can’t find the SK anymore.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, the two parameters mentioned above have been around for quite a while, which is why I didn’t check with TAC again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 07:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258161#M43560</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-25T07:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Special functions via policy - name field</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258170#M43563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Learn something new every day...honestly, had no idea.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258170#M43563</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-25T10:41:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Special functions via policy - name field</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258242#M43574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I knew about PBR_ but did not know about fast_rule_.&lt;BR /&gt;Not familiar with others.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 19:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258242#M43574</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-25T19:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Special functions via policy - name field</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258343#M43603</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The question is whether there are more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I once managed layer 4 switches from a certain manufacturer via the policy name field under R7x as well. They were able to set local access lists and accelerate Layer 4 connections directly on the switch. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But for the life of me, I can’t remember the name or the SK anymore.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Special-functions-via-policy-name-field/m-p/258343#M43603</guid>
      <dc:creator>HeikoAnkenbrand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-26T20:49:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

