<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257507#M43387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you review the device by mac-addr in usercenter is it a "Plus" model?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These usually ship with the dual PSU, LOM, Memory upgrade and expansion slot NIC populated with SR transceivers&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-17T15:50:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257501#M43384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;During a daily check to update some comments on the management, based on the model information, I noticed that on one cluster the output of show asset system reports the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Model: Check Point 6200P&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P data-start="365" data-end="478"&gt;I was wondering what the “P” stands for, or if it’s just a visual bug.&lt;BR data-start="435" data-end="438" /&gt;Not a problem at all — just curiosity.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:17:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257501#M43384</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemoteUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T15:17:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257507#M43387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you review the device by mac-addr in usercenter is it a "Plus" model?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These usually ship with the dual PSU, LOM, Memory upgrade and expansion slot NIC populated with SR transceivers&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257507#M43387</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T15:50:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257510#M43390</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, i checked now it's, Puls for what stand btw?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:54:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257510#M43390</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemoteUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T15:54:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257511#M43391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;6200 Plus is a 6200 bundle with the spec / added accessories described above.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.checkpoint.com/downloads/products/6200-security-gateway-datasheet.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.checkpoint.com/downloads/products/6200-security-gateway-datasheet.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257511#M43391</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T16:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257515#M43393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey bro,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3630"&gt;@Chris_Atkinson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is 100% correct. It stands for plus, though our SE told me technically, could be translated to plus / performance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257515#M43393</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T16:36:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257565#M43404</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much got it&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257565#M43404</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemoteUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-18T06:33:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257566#M43405</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Back in the days before "Plus" there was briefly Turbo and HPP (High Performance Package).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 07:30:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257566#M43405</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-18T07:30:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on “Check Point 6200P” Model</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257575#M43409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good to know Chris!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Clarification-on-Check-Point-6200P-Model/m-p/257575#M43409</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-18T10:03:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

