<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SSH, SCP and SFTP traffic in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SSH-SCP-and-SFTP-traffic/m-p/245629#M41029</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like usual I come to you with 'stupid' questions &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of my customers has a problem: their users figured out that they can copy data by running SCP servers on well known ports. For example one users was running SCP on port 10443&amp;nbsp; which was allowed by a more broad security policy and another one on port 8443 which was my mistake allowed by one miss configured security policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my approach was to enable and use App Control blade with "OpenSSH" application customized to use only ssh and ssh_version_2.&amp;nbsp; Just after this rule, another one with a cloned obiect of OpenSSH this time cutomized with "any" service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This one fixed the issue.&amp;nbsp; SSH is very strict in sources and destinations and therefore is not an issue.&amp;nbsp; What the rule did was to block any other ssh/scp connection on different port and protocol other that 22 (which is by default not allowed).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this one also broke the legit SCP/SFTP connections as the firewall sees those connections on tcp/22 but they have no signature to match "OpenSSH" application. And here is where I got stuck and I would really appreciate some help or guidance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>melcu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-03T16:40:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SSH, SCP and SFTP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SSH-SCP-and-SFTP-traffic/m-p/245629#M41029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like usual I come to you with 'stupid' questions &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of my customers has a problem: their users figured out that they can copy data by running SCP servers on well known ports. For example one users was running SCP on port 10443&amp;nbsp; which was allowed by a more broad security policy and another one on port 8443 which was my mistake allowed by one miss configured security policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my approach was to enable and use App Control blade with "OpenSSH" application customized to use only ssh and ssh_version_2.&amp;nbsp; Just after this rule, another one with a cloned obiect of OpenSSH this time cutomized with "any" service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This one fixed the issue.&amp;nbsp; SSH is very strict in sources and destinations and therefore is not an issue.&amp;nbsp; What the rule did was to block any other ssh/scp connection on different port and protocol other that 22 (which is by default not allowed).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this one also broke the legit SCP/SFTP connections as the firewall sees those connections on tcp/22 but they have no signature to match "OpenSSH" application. And here is where I got stuck and I would really appreciate some help or guidance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SSH-SCP-and-SFTP-traffic/m-p/245629#M41029</guid>
      <dc:creator>melcu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-03T16:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SSH, SCP and SFTP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SSH-SCP-and-SFTP-traffic/m-p/245632#M41031</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the "legitimate" SCP/SFTP to specific servers?&lt;BR /&gt;Then create a specific rule for those servers allowing access using ssh_version_2 before the App Control rule you created.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:47:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/SSH-SCP-and-SFTP-traffic/m-p/245632#M41031</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-03T16:47:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

