<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243068#M40640</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see attached.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-05T13:14:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243018#M40631</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Checkpoint Gurus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to set up a site-to-site VPN with a third-party GW (Router). In the new R82, it looks like there is a feature called "Enhanced link selection."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my GW object, I've defined the External interface as Enhanced Link Selection. But realistically, we don't know how third-party devices are configured. All we do is exchange the security parameters with the given IP address and accept the interesting traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is that I cannot set up my VPN community in Enhanced mode without defining an Enhanced link selection on the third-party object. This doesn't make sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The error message says, "The VPN Community is configured to use "Enhanced Link Selection. "At least one VPN peer does not have configured interfaces. You must configure Enhanced Link Selection Interfaces in each VPN peer object."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer to the attached pictures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We cannot define interface details on third-party objects, and it's not practical to ask our vendors for this information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your help is much appreciated!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243018#M40631</guid>
      <dc:creator>TINTIN8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T00:17:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243027#M40632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I did this in my R82 lab, will send you some screenshots tomorrow. Error is telling you that peer link selection is incorrect, thats why.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 02:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243027#M40632</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T02:23:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243028#M40633</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks the_rock!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 02:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243028#M40633</guid>
      <dc:creator>TINTIN8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T02:23:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243029#M40634</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Of course&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/33969"&gt;@TINTIN8&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 02:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243029#M40634</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T02:25:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243068#M40640</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see attached.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243068#M40640</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T13:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243093#M40645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For interoperable objects, the interface name doesn't have to match what the remote end actually uses.&lt;BR /&gt;You can use something generic like eth0.&lt;BR /&gt;The important thing is that interfaces are defined with the correct IP addresses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 15:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243093#M40645</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T15:40:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243110#M40648</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/33969"&gt;@TINTIN8&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hopefully screenshots I sent are good enough, but if not, let me know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 16:41:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243110#M40648</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-05T16:41:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243154#M40659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you soooo much!!! it worked!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 10:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243154#M40659</guid>
      <dc:creator>TINTIN8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-06T10:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R82  Site to Site VPN with third party Router</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243164#M40660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Glad we can help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R82-Site-to-Site-VPN-with-third-party-Router/m-p/243164#M40660</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-06T12:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

