<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Faiover ports on cluster in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Faiover-ports-on-cluster/m-p/239121#M39941</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two CP15400 devices configured with 4 L3 ports to 4 different zones. Since I no longer need one of the zones, I have removed the physical port but kept the logical configuration intact.&lt;BR /&gt;Initially, CP_01 was active and CP_02 was passive. I first removed E1 from CP_02, then removed E1 from CP_01. The active-passive status on both devices remained unchanged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, I would like to ask: if I continue to use the two devices without removing E1, and one more port on CP_01 goes down, will failover occur to CP_02? And when that port comes back up, what will the status of the two devices be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sacmaugacon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-21T08:18:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Faiover ports on cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Faiover-ports-on-cluster/m-p/239121#M39941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two CP15400 devices configured with 4 L3 ports to 4 different zones. Since I no longer need one of the zones, I have removed the physical port but kept the logical configuration intact.&lt;BR /&gt;Initially, CP_01 was active and CP_02 was passive. I first removed E1 from CP_02, then removed E1 from CP_01. The active-passive status on both devices remained unchanged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, I would like to ask: if I continue to use the two devices without removing E1, and one more port on CP_01 goes down, will failover occur to CP_02? And when that port comes back up, what will the status of the two devices be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Faiover-ports-on-cluster/m-p/239121#M39941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sacmaugacon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-21T08:18:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faiover ports on cluster</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Faiover-ports-on-cluster/m-p/239133#M39943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The recommended process for removing interfaces is captured in the following SK:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk57100" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk57100: Adding or&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;removing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;interface&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;in ClusterXL High Availability topology might cause fail-over&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Faiover-ports-on-cluster/m-p/239133#M39943</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-21T10:33:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

