<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Host Topology in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21166#M3915</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please clarify: is this host object representing Check Point Management Server or some other server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the host's primary IP different from that defined in topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a Static NAT configured for this host's object?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any manual NAT rules that reference IP defined in Topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 03:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-07T03:37:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21162#M3911</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have R77.30 Mgmt server and they have created a Host object and in the host object they have created the Topology for the same, For ex: Host Object: 158.23.x.x and in (If you go to details)topology they have given Internal-&amp;gt; Topology 10.35.x.x . Please let me know what will be the situation to create such configurations? If i try delete that , it creates a outage am not able to identify why it was created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 15:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21162#M3911</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vijay_Nagaraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-04T15:51:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21163#M3912</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm.. Is your host really a multihomed device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not typically see management servers with defined host topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The one reason I can think of to do it would be if you are using local loop address as a management's primary and referring to it in the policy by the host object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 22:22:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21163#M3912</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-04T22:22:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21164#M3913</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does the host object correspond to another multi-homed device e.g. router or the management node itself and where if at all is it used in the security policy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the subnet from the host objects topology also accounted for in the security gateways topology and do you have any logs from during the outage that provide a drop reason? e.g. anti-spoofing (only shown if implied rules are configured for logging)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 01:29:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21164#M3913</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-05T01:29:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21165#M3914</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, it is just a server that's it. Only for few servers it was configured like this. If we remove the topology the traffic is dropped. Is it a very old technology in CP ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:01:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21165#M3914</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vijay_Nagaraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T00:01:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21166#M3915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please clarify: is this host object representing Check Point Management Server or some other server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the host's primary IP different from that defined in topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a Static NAT configured for this host's object?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any manual NAT rules that reference IP defined in Topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 03:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21166#M3915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T03:37:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21167#M3916</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks. it is not representing any CP object. It is just a regular server. There is no Manual or Static NAT configured. All configured is Host level Topology. Now I wanted to remove it but I haven't seen this kind of config ,so bit worried to remove it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vijay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 04:50:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21167#M3916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vijay_Nagaraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T04:50:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host Topology</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21168#M3917</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A potential case of bad practice assigning multiple IPs to the same object rather than updating it upon IP change is one other possible explanation...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case it should be sufficient to identify what hosts now occupy the IPs and update or create new objects / rules to cater for them prior to removal from the identified objects topology to cleanse it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 10:43:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Host-Topology/m-p/21168#M3917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T10:43:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

