<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ClusterXL 3100 with 3200 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225488#M37539</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_cxl variable"&gt;ClusterXL&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;operation completely relies on internal timers and calculation of internal timeouts, which are based on&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;hardware&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;clock ticks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Therefore, in order to avoid unexpected behavior,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_cxl variable"&gt;ClusterXL&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;is supported only between machines with identical CPU characteristics.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-03T14:06:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ClusterXL 3100 with 3200</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225361#M37516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello! Will I be able to merge the 3100 and 3200 clusters? They even have the same name: PB-10. It seems that the hardware is completely identical. Will this be supported by the vendor?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225361#M37516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrey_Gl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T14:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL 3100 with 3200</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225363#M37517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/53455"&gt;@Andrey_Gl&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to create a cluster from different appliances, the answer is “not supported”.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Akos&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 16:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225363#M37517</guid>
      <dc:creator>AkosBakos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T16:50:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL 3100 with 3200</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225482#M37537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 3100 and 3200 have slightly different hardware (CPU speed, I believe).&lt;BR /&gt;ClusterXL only supports cluster members with IDENTICAL hardware.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 13:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225482#M37537</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T13:57:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL 3100 with 3200</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225488#M37539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_cxl variable"&gt;ClusterXL&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;operation completely relies on internal timers and calculation of internal timeouts, which are based on&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;hardware&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;clock ticks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Therefore, in order to avoid unexpected behavior,&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mc-variable Vars_BladesFeatures.tp_cxl variable"&gt;ClusterXL&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;is supported only between machines with identical CPU characteristics.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225488#M37539</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T14:06:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL 3100 with 3200</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225500#M37544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm pretty sure they have different core counts.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/53455"&gt;@Andrey_Gl&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;please run this command in expert mode on a 3100 and on a 3200:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo | head -n 1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It's definitely not supported, but it may be possible to get it to work as a transitional state (e.g, to replace a faulted cluster member with hardware you have on hand while trying to get a better match).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/ClusterXL-3100-with-3200/m-p/225500#M37544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T14:35:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

