<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Does Multi-Domain Server always need to have higher hotfix version than the Firewall Gateway in in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219464#M36582</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Certain firewall versions require the management run a jumbo equal to or higher than a certain version. This mostly affects managing newer minor versions. For example, R81.10 jumbo 82 adds the ability to manage R81.20 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some branded hardware requires a particular jumbo for management to be supported. For example, R81.10 jumbo 141 adds the ability to manage 9000-series branded boxes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fixes to some issues may need a certain jumbo to be on the management to affect how policy is built.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other than those three situations, the management jumbo is mostly independent of the firewall jumbo. That said, updating a management is a&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;lot&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; less risky and a&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;lot&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; lower impact than updating firewalls. Why not do it first?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-02T17:48:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does Multi-Domain Server always need to have higher hotfix version than the Firewall Gateway in it?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219424#M36574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Friends!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advise if&amp;nbsp;Check Point Multi-Domain Server always need to have the higher hotfix version than the Firewalls in it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently my&amp;nbsp;Check Point Multi-Domain Server are&amp;nbsp;R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Take 41 and so are my firewalls on exactly same version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am planning to take 'ONLY' my firewalls to recommended Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator take 65;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Can I do it without any hinderance or effect any of the cluster firewalls or MDS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) If I ALSO do HF upgrade on&amp;nbsp;Check Point Multi-Domain Server and it will definitely restart, will this effect my firewalls in any way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MVS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:56:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219424#M36574</guid>
      <dc:creator>MVS_VF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-02T13:56:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does Multi-Domain Server always need to have higher hotfix version than the Firewall Gateway in</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219464#M36582</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Certain firewall versions require the management run a jumbo equal to or higher than a certain version. This mostly affects managing newer minor versions. For example, R81.10 jumbo 82 adds the ability to manage R81.20 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some branded hardware requires a particular jumbo for management to be supported. For example, R81.10 jumbo 141 adds the ability to manage 9000-series branded boxes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fixes to some issues may need a certain jumbo to be on the management to affect how policy is built.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other than those three situations, the management jumbo is mostly independent of the firewall jumbo. That said, updating a management is a&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;lot&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; less risky and a&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;lot&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; lower impact than updating firewalls. Why not do it first?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 17:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219464#M36582</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-02T17:48:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does Multi-Domain Server always need to have higher hotfix version than the Firewall Gateway in</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219508#M36587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a useful post from a while back (that is still relevant):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/Management-JHF-Did-You-Know/m-p/56880/highlight/true#M9115" target="_self"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/Management-JHF-Did-You-Know/m-p/56880/highlight/true#M9115&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bottom line:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Yes, you can install newer JHF on gateways without installing it on the Management.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If you install an HF on the Management it will indeed restart the server, but short downtime on the Management should not affect gateway traffic.
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;There are some specific flows that involve the Management (such as CME autoscale, or updating DataCenter objects) but regular behavior should be unaffected.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 07:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Does-Multi-Domain-Server-always-need-to-have-higher-hotfix/m-p/219508#M36587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomer_Noy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-03T07:09:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

