<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18510#M3315</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reminder. We did indeed find the file under $R77CMPDIR of the CMA, found that rule #112 was indeed rule #1.112. And seeing the full rule, I realized I had hidden the "time" column in my SmartConsole. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There was a time object limiting validity, and removing this re-enabled acceleration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne_Boettger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-21T08:21:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18505#M3310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have VSX Gateways with R77.30 managed by R80.20. On one VS, acceleration is disabled according to fwaccel stat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Accelerator Status : on&lt;BR /&gt;Accept Templates&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; : disabled by Firewall&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;disabled from rule #112&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Drop Templates&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; : enabled&lt;BR /&gt;NAT Templates&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; : disabled by user&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, we see no reason for this in rule 1.112, and even moved this rule. The status did not change, neither did the rule number diabling acceleration. We found sk62323, and the note regarding R80 to add/substract one from the rule number. But the surrounding rules also dont look like they could disable acceleration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can we map the Rule number from R80.20 Policy to the gateway?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Arne&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18505#M3310</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne_Boettger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T10:05:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18506#M3311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To understand, which rule exactly prevents SecureXL from creating Accept Templates:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Open the policy files on Security Management Server / Domain Management Server:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;$FWDIR/conf/&amp;lt;Security_Policy_Name&amp;gt;.pf&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;$FWDIR/conf/&amp;lt;Security_Policy_Name&amp;gt;.set&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Search for '&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;(rule-N&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;', where &lt;STRONG&gt;N&lt;/STRONG&gt; is the rule number in the output of '&lt;CODE&gt;fwaccel stat&lt;/CODE&gt;'. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Note the '&lt;CODE&gt;name&lt;/CODE&gt;' of the calculated rule within policy files. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Search for '&lt;CODE&gt;name&lt;/CODE&gt;' within your SmartConsole rulebase (might&lt;EM&gt; be a completely different number to the calculated number within the policy files&lt;/EM&gt;).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18506#M3311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T11:26:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18507#M3312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is no &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;$FWDIR/conf/&amp;lt;Security_Policy_Name&amp;gt;.pf&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; File. And the &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;$FWDIR/conf/&amp;lt;Security_Policy_Name&amp;gt;.set&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; was not updated since we upgraded the MDS from R77.30 to R80.20:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-rw-rw-r-- 1 admin root&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 15528060 Nov 28 12:36 Standard.set&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I guess Policy Compliation changed significantly with R80, not leaving this file any more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other hints or ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18507#M3312</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne_Boettger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T11:35:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18508#M3313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try $FWDIR/state/local/FW1/local.rule&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18508#M3313</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T11:50:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18509#M3314</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you’ll find the relevant files in the backward compatibility directories for R77 (not in $FWDIR/conf).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 02:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18509#M3314</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-21T02:17:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18510#M3315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reminder. We did indeed find the file under $R77CMPDIR of the CMA, found that rule #112 was indeed rule #1.112. And seeing the full rule, I realized I had hidden the "time" column in my SmartConsole. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There was a time object limiting validity, and removing this re-enabled acceleration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:21:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18510#M3315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne_Boettger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-21T08:21:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping Rule numbers from R80.20 to fwaccel stat output</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18511#M3316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm glad we could help you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Mapping-Rule-numbers-from-R80-20-to-fwaccel-stat-output/m-p/18511#M3316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-21T09:11:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

