<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PSA: implied_rules_HFA.def in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197846#M33135</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It has to be this one?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CP-management:0]# find / -name *_HFA.def*&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/CPSFWR80CMP-R81.20/lib/implied_rules_HFA.def&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@CP-management:0]#&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-13T17:39:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PSA: implied_rules_HFA.def</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197844#M33134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just a PSA here, something even I never ran into before:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In $FWDIR/lib on the management server, you know about those *_HFA.def files that the HFA updates create so as to not blow up your own edits. &amp;nbsp;IIRC, historically, those weren't needed by fw_loader to compile the policy. &amp;nbsp;Well, apparently, in R81(.20?), they now need to exist! &amp;nbsp;I dunno how they get handled vis a vis a customized file (i.e.: implied_rules.def).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I had a server where I needed the new implied rules list (cxld, iked, etc.) so I did the usual steps: check a diff between the current file and the _HFA.def file, made a backup of the current file, renamed the necessary _HFA.def to the main file (if needed), do any necessary edits, check it, and install policy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Whoooaaaaa, not so fast! &amp;nbsp;A policy install with mgmt_cli (or API remotely) worked just fine. &amp;nbsp;However, when I did the policy install from SmartConsole, I got "Internal Error", and it died. &amp;nbsp;I ran a cpm_debug on the management server for the "Access_Install" topic, and it showed error exceptions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;13/11/23 12:13:35,283 ERROR com.checkpoint.management.dleserver.coresvc.internal.PolicyInstallationSvcImpl.installPolicy:890 [qtp-882154951-34077]: Failed to install policy due to unexpected exception java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: /opt/CPsuite-R81.20/fw1/lib/implied_rules_HFA.def
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;That's...odd.... I just did a "cp implied_rules.def implied_rules_HFA.def" and the SmartConsole policy install worked again!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PSA: don't remove those _HFA.def files just yet!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(yes, i have R81.20 gateways under management as well)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197844#M33134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T17:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PSA: implied_rules_HFA.def</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197846#M33135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It has to be this one?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CP-management:0]# find / -name *_HFA.def*&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/CPSFWR80CMP-R81.20/lib/implied_rules_HFA.def&lt;BR /&gt;[Expert@CP-management:0]#&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197846#M33135</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T17:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PSA: implied_rules_HFA.def</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197848#M33136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah my particular error here was the implied_rules_HFA.def. &amp;nbsp;It didn't seem to care about any others:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;[Expert@mgmt:0]# grep -o 'lib\/.*HFA.def' cpm.elg |sort|uniq
lib/implied_rules_HFA.def
&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:44:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197848#M33136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duane_Toler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T17:44:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PSA: implied_rules_HFA.def</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197849#M33137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can sort of see that, makes total sense.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PSA-implied-rules-HFA-def/m-p/197849#M33137</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T17:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

