<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187397#M31359</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you provide a network diagram that explains the relationship between physical 600 appliances and Hyper-V and the expected traffic flows?&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, the 600 appliances are End of Support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-24T20:43:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187376#M31355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have 2 cp600 in HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 hyper-v with network teaming enabled and another hyper-v not network teamed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;virtual machine from not teamed hyper-v does not&amp;nbsp; ping another vm in teamed hyper-v.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after broked network teaming all work as aspected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do you have experience if is possible to configure hyper-v network teaming and make it works with HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:06:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187376#M31355</guid>
      <dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-24T16:06:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187397#M31359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you provide a network diagram that explains the relationship between physical 600 appliances and Hyper-V and the expected traffic flows?&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, the 600 appliances are End of Support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:43:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187397#M31359</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-24T20:43:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187406#M31362</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7"&gt;@PhoneBoy&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;asked, network diagram would really help us help you here. Please blur out any sensitive info.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 01:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187406#M31362</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-25T01:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187449#M31363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi, network diagram as requested.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187449#M31363</guid>
      <dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-25T08:31:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187454#M31364</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To clarify your diagram further are the affected hosts on the same subnet or different?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187454#M31364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-25T08:56:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187456#M31365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;affected&amp;nbsp; host are on same subnet, i am considering only HA subnet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;while i was drawing the diagram it cames in mind the onlyv vm aren't pingable, phisical host yes, so&amp;nbsp; i think it could be how teaming manage vm's mac address&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187456#M31365</guid>
      <dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-25T09:04:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187711#M31429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;network diagram as requested.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there aren't subnet specified becauase is only one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187711#M31429</guid>
      <dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-26T14:56:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187713#M31430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What are the VMs that you mention?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If the hosts are on the same subnet and connected via intermediate switches this shouldn't be a firewall problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187713#M31430</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-26T15:35:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: cp 600 high availability and hyper-v with network teaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187733#M31437</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;in fact i'm talking about teaming configuration and not about firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/cp-600-high-availability-and-hyper-v-with-network-teaming/m-p/187733#M31437</guid>
      <dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-26T16:29:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

