<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Use of FQDN in Phase 2 of an S2S VPN in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Use-of-FQDN-in-Phase-2-of-an-S2S-VPN/m-p/185907#M31005</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, everyone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone from your own experience managed to work with an OBJECT of type FQDN (Domain) in Phase 2 of an S2S VPN?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this feasible?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a VPN created, in which the remote peer, the IP "that goes through the tunnel" is a dynamic public IP (it changes from time to time), and they intend to achieve that our CP does not arrive at their side, "pointing" to their IP of Phase 2, but that we arrive through a URL that they provide us (e.g. .api.chkpnd.com).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to achieve this connectivity?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-07T12:20:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Use of FQDN in Phase 2 of an S2S VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Use-of-FQDN-in-Phase-2-of-an-S2S-VPN/m-p/185907#M31005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, everyone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone from your own experience managed to work with an OBJECT of type FQDN (Domain) in Phase 2 of an S2S VPN?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this feasible?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a VPN created, in which the remote peer, the IP "that goes through the tunnel" is a dynamic public IP (it changes from time to time), and they intend to achieve that our CP does not arrive at their side, "pointing" to their IP of Phase 2, but that we arrive through a URL that they provide us (e.g. .api.chkpnd.com).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to achieve this connectivity?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Use-of-FQDN-in-Phase-2-of-an-S2S-VPN/m-p/185907#M31005</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matlu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-07T12:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of FQDN in Phase 2 of an S2S VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Use-of-FQDN-in-Phase-2-of-an-S2S-VPN/m-p/185982#M31024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A route-based VPN with App-Based Routing for the given URL seems like the only possibility.&lt;BR /&gt;Refer the following SK for more details/limitations:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167135" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk167135&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2023 15:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Use-of-FQDN-in-Phase-2-of-an-S2S-VPN/m-p/185982#M31024</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-09T15:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

