<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182026#M30331</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it a single ISP or the same ISP with two different NAT numbers?&lt;BR /&gt;If they are different ISPs, you should be able to accomplish this via ISP Redundancy.&lt;BR /&gt;See:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34812" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34812&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Otherwise, you should use a &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/skI1915" target="_blank"&gt;Dynamic Object&lt;/A&gt; in your NAT rule instead (which is what ISP Redundancy ultimately does).&lt;BR /&gt;You'll need to write a script to update the contents of this Dynamic Object using the dynamic_objects CLI command on each gateway that uses this object.&lt;BR /&gt;However, this gives you flexibility as to how and when to "fail over" the NAT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 20:57:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-24T20:57:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/181974#M30316</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to make Nat Rule for redundancy ISP for out going traffic. I have 2 ISP and Objects are Statically nated with their respective IP from ISP.I want configure a fail over nat rule. Is it possible or any other solution will be help full.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* ISPs are terminated in a Cisco Wan Switch and Checkpoint is connected directly with Wan Switch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GW version 81.20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 16:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/181974#M30316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Subhojit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T16:48:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182026#M30331</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it a single ISP or the same ISP with two different NAT numbers?&lt;BR /&gt;If they are different ISPs, you should be able to accomplish this via ISP Redundancy.&lt;BR /&gt;See:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34812" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34812&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Otherwise, you should use a &lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/skI1915" target="_blank"&gt;Dynamic Object&lt;/A&gt; in your NAT rule instead (which is what ISP Redundancy ultimately does).&lt;BR /&gt;You'll need to write a script to update the contents of this Dynamic Object using the dynamic_objects CLI command on each gateway that uses this object.&lt;BR /&gt;However, this gives you flexibility as to how and when to "fail over" the NAT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 20:57:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182026#M30331</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T20:57:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182030#M30332</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you say make NAT rules for ISP redundancy, you mean create different nat rules based on what subnets would go out of which ISP link?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or did I misunderstand that totally?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182030#M30332</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T21:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182031#M30333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In this case, you don't need two rules, you only need one...in terms of the Dynamic Object you've created.&lt;BR /&gt;The Dynamic Object will determine what the IP will ultimately be translated to.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 21:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182031#M30333</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T21:31:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182033#M30334</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Never knew that was possible...would you mind attach a screenshot of what nat rule would look like in case like that?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 21:41:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182033#M30334</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T21:41:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182035#M30335</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The "translated source" would contain the Dynamic Object you created.&lt;BR /&gt;It's otherwise like any other NAT rule.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 21:48:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182035#M30335</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T21:48:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182064#M30341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 03:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182064#M30341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Subhojit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T03:34:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182072#M30344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If i configure two IP from different ISPs in a sigle dynamic object.Does NAT will failover to another IP automatically if one ISP fail ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 06:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182072#M30344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Subhojit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T06:10:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Auto Hide Nat Redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182201#M30373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Configuring more than one IP in a Dynamic Object used in this manner won't fail over.&lt;BR /&gt;The script you write will determine the failover conditions and what IP is used in what case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 21:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Auto-Hide-Nat-Redundancy/m-p/182201#M30373</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-25T21:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

