<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: set mtu size for ipsec vpn tunnel in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/173190#M28893</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I haven't tested this myself. But when using VTI you can set MTU higher than 1500 on the VTI interface. The documentation on this is rather sparse, but I see no reason why it wouldn't work? Unless Check Point Gaia is starting to fragment the traffic when it passes the external interface? But if the ISP is providing a transport supporting Jumbo Frames, one would figure you are able to have Jumbo Frames on the external interface as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is a rather strange thing to do as you don't often have scenarios where you have WAN between locations supporting Jumbo Frames where you would rely on IPsec VPN with Jumbo Frames. If you have a transport path between locations supporting Jumbo Frames, you would normally not have the need for encryption and if you do you would not do it on the firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 13:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RamGuy239</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-01T13:15:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>set mtu size for ipsec vpn tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/172942#M28858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;our client wants to create a new ipsec tunnel that allows jumbo frame with mtu size of 2000 to the remote site&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can it be done?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and is it possible to set the mtu size on that specific tunnel without changing the settings of physical interfaces and other tunnels?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/172942#M28858</guid>
      <dc:creator>cp0102</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T06:45:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set mtu size for ipsec vpn tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/172943#M28859</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No - see &lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" style="max-width: 840px;" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk98074&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt; sk98074: &lt;STRONG&gt;MTU&lt;/STRONG&gt; and Fragmentation Issues in IPsec VPN&lt;/A&gt; for details !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:50:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/172943#M28859</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T06:50:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set mtu size for ipsec vpn tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/172946#M28860</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Step 1 - Does the transport path in between the locations support jumbo frames?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 07:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/172946#M28860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-28T07:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set mtu size for ipsec vpn tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/173190#M28893</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I haven't tested this myself. But when using VTI you can set MTU higher than 1500 on the VTI interface. The documentation on this is rather sparse, but I see no reason why it wouldn't work? Unless Check Point Gaia is starting to fragment the traffic when it passes the external interface? But if the ISP is providing a transport supporting Jumbo Frames, one would figure you are able to have Jumbo Frames on the external interface as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is a rather strange thing to do as you don't often have scenarios where you have WAN between locations supporting Jumbo Frames where you would rely on IPsec VPN with Jumbo Frames. If you have a transport path between locations supporting Jumbo Frames, you would normally not have the need for encryption and if you do you would not do it on the firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 13:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/set-mtu-size-for-ipsec-vpn-tunnel/m-p/173190#M28893</guid>
      <dc:creator>RamGuy239</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T13:15:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

