<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167726#M27882</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is there a NAT policy which maybe e.g. hides the source ip of the outgoing packet behind gateways external address?&lt;BR /&gt;Then the packet does not match the Phase 2 config and is dropped and a rule above this rule would be required to disable nat between both devices communicating thru the tunnel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vincent_Bacher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-13T08:07:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167724#M27881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are trying to setup a site to site VPN connection with a Sophos firewall but we are receiving&amp;nbsp; "&amp;nbsp;Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information" error on the logs so after re-checking the configurations on both the devices we verified the configurations are the same on both the sides. So any suggestion how to fix this issue ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And we received the same error message when we tried to setup a Site-to-Site VPN with Opensense firewall as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#1530 #Quantum_Sparks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 07:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167724#M27881</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-13T07:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167726#M27882</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is there a NAT policy which maybe e.g. hides the source ip of the outgoing packet behind gateways external address?&lt;BR /&gt;Then the packet does not match the Phase 2 config and is dropped and a rule above this rule would be required to disable nat between both devices communicating thru the tunnel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167726#M27882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincent_Bacher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-13T08:07:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167728#M27883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 08:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167728#M27883</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-13T08:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167746#M27886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;NAT is disabled on both the sites still the issue is persisting&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/167746#M27886</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-13T10:39:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/171415#M28639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;RE: IKEv2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does Check Point require Phase2 quick mode/Proxy-ID/traffic selectors when connecting to a 3rd party vendor (Palo Alto 7050 10.1.8 in my case)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/171415#M28639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Kavan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:22:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/172054#M28714</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No idea but on the new release this is mentioned maybe it will reduce the problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remote Access VPN Strongswan (VPN 3rd party)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/172054#M28714</guid>
      <dc:creator>arsathparves</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-20T13:30:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quick mode Received Notification from Peer: invalid id information</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/173693#M29009</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, We were able to get it going from tips here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="xxxxmsonormal"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/Site-to-Site-VPN-between-Checkpoint-and-Palo-Alto-Firewalls/td-p/15935__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!tXAi62IjpL1YalDjZXhRoLVMHm9rcMLTjKxTOXSkn4m05g--KC4wJpb11gk1SUJ9inWh_yD1Ktd_$" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/Site-to-Site-VPN-between-Checkpoint-and-Palo-Alto-Firewalls/td-p/15935&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 13:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Quick-mode-Received-Notification-from-Peer-invalid-id/m-p/173693#M29009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Kavan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T13:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

