<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking  in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14476#M2467</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i question for the specific release with Check Point Office and respond not exist this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:13:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jesus_Vladimir_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-29T15:13:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14462#M2453</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, how to configure PBR for redundancy automatic,i try Priority but not functioning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14462#M2453</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesus_Vladimir_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T15:31:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14463#M2454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A network diagram of what you're trying to do would be helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:11:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14463#M2454</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T07:11:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14464#M2455</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you want to use two external connectivity and have an automatic backup if you loose one of them ( if I understand correctly) probably you need to implement ISP redundancy , policy base routing wont work in that way &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:53:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14464#M2455</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco_Valenti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T10:53:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14465#M2456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is the diagram.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User A connect to internet to ISP A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User B connect to internet to ISP B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User C connect to internet to ISP C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/61092_pastedImage_1.png" style="width: 620px; height: 334px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When ISP A is down automatic failover to ISP B or ISP C configured with priority is not functioning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14465#M2456</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesus_Vladimir_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T15:06:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14466#M2457</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How would the gateway determine ISP A is down?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To do that, you'd need to have a reachability test (such as Ping)--something our PBR doesn't currently support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14466#M2457</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T16:26:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14467#M2458</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes i understand, there is developed for coming soon pbr support this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14467#M2458</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesus_Vladimir_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T16:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14468#M2459</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A little-known feature of ClusterXL may be able to help here; ClusterXL can be configured to test connectivity to upstream IP addresses with ping, and initiate a failover based on loss of reachability to the pinged hosts.&amp;nbsp; There could be a very different Gaia PBR configuration on the standby member that takes over as a result.&amp;nbsp; See:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk35780&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL%22"&gt;sk35780: How to configure $FWDIR/bin/clusterXL_monitor_ips script to run automatically on Gaia / SecurePlatform OS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14468#M2459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T23:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14469#M2460</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;sk100500:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PBR is supported in the following clusters:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ClusterXL High Availability&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ClusterXL Load Sharing Unicast&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ClusterXL Load Sharing Multicast&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;VRRP&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Note:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PBR must be configured on each of the cluster members individually, and the &lt;STRONG&gt;configuration must be identical&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can you shed some light if the above statement is correct or is it negated by the&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk35780&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL%22" rel="nofollow" style="color: #e45785; background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px; text-decoration: underline; font-size: 16px; padding: 0px calc(12px + 0.35ex) 0px 0px;"&gt;sk35780&lt;/A&gt;?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14469#M2460</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T21:02:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14470#M2461</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd say the later SK is probably more correct and the PBR configs should match.&amp;nbsp; I don't think ClusterXL will be able to actually tell if the PBR configuration is different between the cluster members (same way it can't tell if regular IP routing is different between them), but it may cause issues with how connections are represented between the members via state sync.&amp;nbsp; Trying a different PBR config between different cluster members will probably work but will most certainly not be supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14470#M2461</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T23:01:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14471#M2462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe it's planned, yes, but don't have an exact timeframe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 06:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14471#M2462</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-02T06:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14472#M2463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;some date estimated for this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 21:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14472#M2463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesus_Vladimir_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-06T21:31:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14473#M2464</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears there is a customer-specific release that offers this functionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please check with your Check Point office.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 08:43:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14473#M2464</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-08T08:43:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14474#M2465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello! I have the same question! Is there any workaround for now? There past one year since first question..... How to achieve same functionality as on ip sla + track on cisco in PBR?????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14474#M2465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tolchenov_Maksi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-13T09:03:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14475#M2466</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please check with your local office about the customer-specific release I mentioned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 02:57:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14475#M2466</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-14T02:57:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14476#M2467</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i question for the specific release with Check Point Office and respond not exist this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:13:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14476#M2467</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesus_Vladimir_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-29T15:13:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14477#M2468</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contact me privately with who you're working with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll connect the dots on the backend.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/14477#M2468</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-29T15:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/61800#M12527</link>
      <description>PBR with multiple ISPs is now supported from R80.30.&lt;BR /&gt;This is recommended versus using the customer releases previously mentioned.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/61800#M12527</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T23:44:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/63017#M12772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi PhoneBoy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a situation that need to use tracking host too. Let say from my Check Point Firewall, i have 2 connection to remote site. 1 is primary and 1 is backup. I want to track if primary connection are down (track by ping or something else) all connection to remote site will automaticly change to thê backup connection. And if primary connection up again, then all connections automaticly move back to primary connection. Can we do that with R80.10 or i have to upgrade to R80.30 ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/63017#M12772</guid>
      <dc:creator>quanglnh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-18T08:38:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/63050#M12782</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body lia-component-message-view-widget-body lia-component-body-signature-highlight-escalation lia-component-message-view-widget-body-signature-highlight-escalation"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/34246"&gt;@quanglnh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;You can do this with Multi Hop PBR from 80.30 onwards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/63050#M12782</guid>
      <dc:creator>FedericoMeiners</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-18T13:28:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBR With Multiple Tracking</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/63359#M12847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks Federico Meiners, I will check on this&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2019 16:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/PBR-With-Multiple-Tracking/m-p/63359#M12847</guid>
      <dc:creator>quanglnh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-22T16:03:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

