<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Intervlan routing allow A&amp;gt;B but Block B&amp;gt;A in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/120982#M22497</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It works exactly the same way in Check Point.&lt;BR /&gt;You define an Access Policy rule that allows A to talk to B on the desired ports/services.&lt;BR /&gt;This allows reply traffic from B only if A initiated the connection.&lt;BR /&gt;B cannot initiate a connection to A unless there is an explicit rule allowing it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-11T22:43:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intervlan routing allow A&gt;B but Block B&gt;A</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/120981#M22496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone.. can anybody share some experience on how they achieved a setup with inter vlan routing where vlan A can access B but B cannot access A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my ubiquiti world where I come from I was able to push a firewall rule stating that established &amp;amp; related traffic was allowed and then I blocked B to A..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thay way A was able to access B and B was allowed to reply, &amp;nbsp;but B was never able to start the connection ..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/120981#M22496</guid>
      <dc:creator>skandshus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-11T22:00:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intervlan routing allow A&gt;B but Block B&gt;A</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/120982#M22497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It works exactly the same way in Check Point.&lt;BR /&gt;You define an Access Policy rule that allows A to talk to B on the desired ports/services.&lt;BR /&gt;This allows reply traffic from B only if A initiated the connection.&lt;BR /&gt;B cannot initiate a connection to A unless there is an explicit rule allowing it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:43:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/120982#M22497</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-11T22:43:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intervlan routing allow A&gt;B but Block B&gt;A</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/121015#M22499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That’s nice. So if I ever needed bi directional access I would have to make explicit rule allowing A to B and B to A otherwise it would not happen ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/121015#M22499</guid>
      <dc:creator>skandshus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-12T07:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intervlan routing allow A&gt;B but Block B&gt;A</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/121023#M22506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes &lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/61227"&gt;@skandshus&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; it everything will be blocked until you open/configure the relevant policy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 11:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Intervlan-routing-allow-A-gt-B-but-Block-B-gt-A/m-p/121023#M22506</guid>
      <dc:creator>CSR</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-12T11:59:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

